- From: Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:44:37 +0000
- To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
> Does there need to be a default channel? What problem does the default channel cause that would be worth even a tiny amount of effort to fix? -----Original Message----- From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:23 AM To: public-w3process@w3.org Subject: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/154 Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile On product: Process Document This should be a tiny issue, so I hope we can resolve it in passing. In section 8.1.1 on AC reviews it says [1] [[[The Team must provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments: + an archived Team-only channel; this is the default channel for reviews. ]]] Does there need to be a default channel? I would suggest not, others have suggested it is helpful - and others have suggested it is helpful if it is to publish it to the world.
Received on Friday, 30 January 2015 19:45:06 UTC