- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 13:51:14 -0600
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 1:31 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm sure that there would be hesitance (I think it's been officially said no) to disclose anything about the voting experiements, but is there -any- kind of info? Like, what % of people who voted voted in experiments? I'm not sure how it was arranged - was it possible that someone voted in experiments without voting in the real thing? Is it possible to say something that doesn't give it away or undermine but still says something useful - like, the numeric order of "most votes to least votes" differed from the same kind of preferential sort? We’re doing the analysis and then we will chat with the AB; they’ll give us guidance on what/how to share. Ian > > -- > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: hitchjs.com -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 19:51:16 UTC