public-swbp-wg@w3.org from March 2004 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2004

• Re: ALL: agenda April 1 telecon Nick Gibbins
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• Re: ALL: agenda April 1 telecon Jim Hendler
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Natasha Noy
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Aldo Gangemi
• ALL: agenda April 1 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: draft task-force template Guus Schreiber
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments David Norheim
• [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A possible use case for WordNet [was: RE: WordNet Task Force - wo rk outline] Danny Ayers
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Aldo Gangemi
• A possible use case for WordNet [was: RE: WordNet Task Force - wo rk outline] McBride, Brian
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Aldo Gangemi
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Frank van Harmelen
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Jim Hendler
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments Uschold, Michael F
• RE: ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Pat Hayes
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Pat Hayes
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Pat Hayes
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Pat Hayes
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 30 March 2004

• Re: Statements about links in XHTML 2 [was RE: customer feedback, please] Ben Adida
• Re: customer feedback, please Nick Gibbins
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Jeremy Carroll
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Natasha Noy
• RE: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions are inadequate (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Uschold, Michael F

Monday, 29 March 2004

• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• RE: [ALL, WRLD] "World" TF description (informal) Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 30 March 2004

• Re: [OPEN] what's in an acronym Deborah L. McGuinness

Monday, 29 March 2004

• Re: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions are inadequate (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Jim Hendler
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F
• [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions are inadequate (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) Uschold, Michael F
• RE: On a possible role for the applications and demos task force Uschold, Michael F
• RE: draft task-force template Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [ALL, WRLD] "World" TF description (informal) Uschold, Michael F
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question $swpbd Uschold, Michael F

Saturday, 27 March 2004

• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Aldo Gangemi
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Ian Horrocks
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Ian Horrocks
• Re: ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Dan Brickley
• Re: ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Pat Hayes

Friday, 26 March 2004

• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Aldo Gangemi
• Re: customer feedback, please Dan Connolly
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Guus Schreiber
• Re: On a possible role for the applications and demos task force Jeremy Carroll
• RE: On a possible role for the applications and demos task force NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Guus Schreiber
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• ALL: draft task-force template Guus Schreiber

Wednesday, 24 March 2004

• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Jim Hendler

Friday, 26 March 2004

• Re: On a possible role for the applications and demos task force Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 25 March 2004

• Re: On a possible role for the applications and demos task force Aditya A Kalyanpur
• [ALL, WRLD] "World" TF description (informal) Jim Hendler
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Aldo Gangemi
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• Re: telecon April 1 Christopher Welty
• Re: ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Christopher Welty
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• All: Attachments to the list (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Christopher Welty
• Statements about links in XHTML 2 [was RE: customer feedback, please] Mark Birbeck
• On a possible role for the applications and demos task force McBride, Brian
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Bernard Vatant
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Bernard Vatant
• Re: ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jeremy Carroll
• telecon April 1 Guus Schreiber
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Uschold, Michael F

Wednesday, 24 March 2004

• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Nicola Guarino
• ALL: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) Jim Hendler
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Natasha Noy
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Ian Horrocks
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Aldo Gangemi
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Natasha Noy
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Christopher Welty
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Bernard Vatant
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Bernard Vatant

Tuesday, 23 March 2004

• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question DeborahL.McGuinness
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Christopher Welty
• WordNet Task Force - work outline Aldo Gangemi
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Jim Hendler
• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Bernard Vatant
• XSCH issues from RDF Core and WebOnt Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 22 March 2004

• RE: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Bernard Vatant
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Christopher Welty
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Christopher Welty

Friday, 19 March 2004

• ALL: Introduction: Jen Golbeck Jennifer Golbeck
• [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question Bernard Vatant
• Re: customer feedback, please Ben Adida
• RE: draft Minutes 18 Mar Mark Birbeck
• Introduction - Jim Hendler Jim Hendler
• Re: draft Minutes 18 Mar Dan Brickley
• draft Minutes 18 Mar Jeremy Carroll
• # vs / or = or ? Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 18 March 2004

• customer feedback, please Dan Connolly
• ALL: Introduction: Aditya Kalyanpur Aditya A Kalyanpur
• RE: [OPEN] what's in an acronym Oscar Corcho
• Re: [OPEN] what's in an acronym Christopher Welty
• Re: [OPEN] what's in an acronym Deborah L. McGuinness
• ALL: Introduction: Nick Gibbins Nick Gibbins
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Jos De_Roo
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Dan Brickley
• Introduction: Jeremy Carroll Jeremy Carroll
• Introduction Asemantics WG members David Norheim
• RE : ALL: agenda 18 March telecon LEGER Alain FTRD/DMI/REN
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon David Norheim

Wednesday, 17 March 2004

• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Ben Adida

Thursday, 18 March 2004

• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon [telecon times] Ralph R. Swick
• Re: [OPEN] what's in an acronym Brian McBride
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Brian McBride

Wednesday, 17 March 2004

• RE: TMAP : Action : Draft message to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Bernard Vatant
• Re: agenda 18 March telecon Nicola Guarino
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Libby Miller
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: agenda 18 March telecon Oscar Corcho
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Natasha Noy
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Christopher Welty
• ALL: Introduction CWI WG members J.R. van Ossenbruggen
• Re: ALL draft minutes Cannes ftf Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• SVG and Semantic Web applications michael bolger
• ALL: agenda 18 March telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: ALL draft minutes Cannes ftf Jim Hendler
• ALL draft minutes Cannes ftf Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 16 March 2004

• Workshop at AAAI Christopher Welty
• 7am for a telecon? - please consider new times was: Re: Reminder: telecon March 18 Deborah L. McGuinness
• [OPEN] Agenda for 3/16 telecon Christopher Welty
• Reminder: telecon March 18 Guus Schreiber
• ALL : regrets for 18 March telecon NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP

Friday, 12 March 2004

• RE: [OPEN] what's in an acronym (was: new member invitations) Christopher Welty
• RE: [OPEN] new member invitations Uschold, Michael F

Thursday, 11 March 2004

• Re: Regrets for CG telecon Brian McBride
• Regrets for CG telecon Brian McBride
• RE: TMAP : Action : Draft message to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Bernard Vatant
• Re: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TMAP : Action : Draft message to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Alan Rector
• Re: [OPEN] new member invitations Alan Rector
• TMAP : Action : Draft message to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Bernard Vatant
• Re: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Natasha Noy
• RE: [OPEN] new member invitations Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OPEN] new member invitations Uschold, Michael F

Wednesday, 10 March 2004

• RE: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Uschold, Michael F
• [OPEN] new member invitations Christopher Welty
• Re: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Christopher Welty
• Re: Qualified Cardinality Constraints Jeremy Carroll
• Qualified Cardinality Constraints Alan Rector
• Re: top-3's received so far Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 9 March 2004

• Re: top-3's received so far Alan Rector
• RE: test Scott Wiseman
• test Scott Wiseman
• correction to F2F misspeaking Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 8 March 2004

• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Christopher Welty
• RE: ALL: attachments Uschold, Michael F
• Re: ALL: attachments Christopher Welty
• ALL: attachments Jeremy Carroll
• Pat vs. Chris on doctrine Christopher Welty
• APPS : Semantic Web Application definition criterias NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP

Sunday, 7 March 2004

• UNITS : SWEET Project Bernard Vatant
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Jos De_Roo

Saturday, 6 March 2004

• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Pat Hayes

Friday, 5 March 2004

• [Fwd: A link to a meta-review of an example of OWL practice] Guus Schreiber
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Christopher Welty

Thursday, 4 March 2004

• location of task forces wiki page Christopher Welty

Friday, 5 March 2004

• votes from meeting march 5 Dave Beckett

Thursday, 4 March 2004

• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Pat Hayes
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Pat Hayes
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Jos De_Roo
• Re: top-3's received so far Jos De_Roo
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Jim Hendler
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Pat Hayes
• my top-3 Libby Miller
• danbri sw bpd wg - wishlist slides Dan Brickley
• advance offer for f2f facilitation Deborah L. McGuinness

Wednesday, 3 March 2004

• My top-3 Liddy Nevile
• Re: top-3's received so far Natasha Noy
• Re: Tech Plenary: agenda Best Practices Pat Hayes
• RE: top-3's received so far NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP
• top-3's received so far Guus Schreiber

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2004 16:09:02 UTC