- From: David Norheim <david@asemantics.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:26:31 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Remember who is our 'customers' here, the syntax should rather help them than us. In most cases I believe that the 'customer' will be engineers trying to build systems using RDF/RDFS/OWL, me being one of them. These people are usually already quite familiar with XML and possibly RDF, and it is actually easier using an RDF/XML syntax. Cut and paste reasons was actually very useful in HTML. David On Mar 31, 2004, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > A further concern I have is that many Semantic Web users use mainly > RDF with maybe just a tiny bit of OWL ... To communicate with them OWL > Abstract Syntax is not appropriate. > > Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 07:29:09 UTC