- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:39:25 -0500
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5D0DCA07.36CCC0D3-ON85256E51.00550FE1-85256E51.005601E8@us.ibm.com>
I find when writing collaboratively that MS Word's "change tracking" and
editing facilities are very useful. Sure there are ways to do this in
HTML (like inventing a style sheet with a "change" tag), but they are not
automatic and require just enough extra work that it tends not to get
used. Mike (Smith) and I tried doing that while editing the guide, and it
just didn't work. Mike ended up just doing diffs every time I made
changes.
Anyway, I would never force MS Word on anyone, but it may make sense for
smaller groups, like task forces for example, where all the member of the
group agree, to use something like MS Word for developing a document, and
then posting the HTML version of it when it's in some version-able draft
form. This way the process is still "open" (in that there are free MS
Word "readers" out there), but the work doesn't have to be encumbered by
lack of tool support.
-Chris
Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA
Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web:
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
"Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Sent by: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
03/08/2004 08:44 AM
To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
cc:
Subject: ALL: attachments
I took an action to explain methods of dealing with attachments etc in W3C
lists.
The following describes some policy,
http://www.w3.org/2002/03/email_attachment_formats.html
which in summary is
plain text is best
html or xhtml is second best
The harder case that is not explained in full is what do you do when you
have content in some proprietary format, particularly if the files are
large.
e.g. I had a document in a proprietary format that I wished to send to the
www-rdf-interest list.
Step 1) Create a PDF (if necessary this might been creating a postscript
file and then converting that with ghostview)
Step 2) send PDF as attachment to www-archive@w3.org
This mailing list is public but no natural subscribers, and is intended
for
large attachments, amongst other purposes.
Step 3) Find URL of attachement by looking at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/
Step 4) Send URL to the intended mailing list e.g. see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Feb/0231
where I note the long URL got mangled ...
Reviewing the policy I probably could have created an xhtml version with
only a little more effort than the PDF and that would have been better.
It is particularly important to use this technique of sending to
www-archive
when the attachment is large.
If you wish to send something with member confidentiality to a public list
the same technique can be used by sending to w3c-archive@w3.org which is
archived at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/
If you have a complex set of interlinked files in the same directory it is
possible to send them all as attachments to www-archive and the links will
be maintained. Example is:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Feb/att-0071/
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 10:41:17 UTC