public-sw-meaning@w3.org from October 2003 by author

Bijan Parsia

• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Thursday, 16 October)
• Relevant bits of the TAG doc? (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: otiose vs odious (Friday, 10 October)
• Against Strong Ontological Commitment (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Some talking points for today (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Fwd: Freedom lovin' formalists (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? (Friday, 3 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Friday, 10 October)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Using two URIs for the same thing (Saturday, 18 October)
• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Friday, 17 October)
• [Fwd: consensus and ownership] (Tuesday, 14 October)
• Re: Relevant bits of the TAG doc? (Saturday, 11 October)
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: Against Strong Ontological Commitment (Friday, 10 October)
• consensus and consistency (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• FYI: timbl and bijan chatting about running code, closure, etc. (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: Tim v. Bijan use case (was Re: Proposed issue:...) (Friday, 3 October)

Graham Klyne

• Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership] (Wednesday, 15 October)
• Re: otiose vs odious (Saturday, 11 October)
• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: FYI: timbl and bijan chatting about running code, closure, etc. (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? (Monday, 6 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Sunday, 5 October)
• What is the issue (Thursday, 2 October)

Jim Farrugia

• book on argument and inference, Gabbay et al. (Thursday, 9 October)

Jim Hendler

• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: FYI: timbl and bijan chatting about running code, closure, etc. (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: Provenance/Justification (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Tim v. Bijan use case (was Re: Proposed issue:...) (Friday, 3 October)

John Black

• RE: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Friday, 31 October)
• RE: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? (Thursday, 9 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Friday, 3 October)
• RE: Thought experiments on a proposed solution (Friday, 3 October)
• RE: Thought experiments on a proposed solution (Wednesday, 1 October)
• Thought experiments on a proposed solution (Wednesday, 1 October)

karl

• Re: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Friday, 17 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Tuesday, 14 October)
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Tuesday, 14 October)

Lynn, James (Software Services)

• RE: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• RE: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Friday, 17 October)
• RE: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Thursday, 16 October)
• RE: in defense of standards (Tuesday, 14 October)

LYNN,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)

• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Friday, 3 October)

pat hayes

• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Thursday, 30 October)
• RE: Terms and statements (was: consensus and ownership) (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership] (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: consensus and consistency (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: Provenance/Justification (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: Tim v. Bijan use case (was Re: Proposed issue:...) (Monday, 6 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Monday, 6 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Saturday, 4 October)
• RE: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Friday, 3 October)
• RE: Thought experiments on a proposed solution (Thursday, 2 October)
• Re: Thought experiments on a proposed solution (Wednesday, 1 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Friday, 31 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my software? (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: Proposed issue: What does using an URI require of me and my s oftware? (Friday, 3 October)
• Re: Thought experiments on a proposed solution (Friday, 3 October)

Sandro Hawke

• [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Thursday, 30 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Re: The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• The RDF Approach to Indicating Language-In-Use (Wednesday, 29 October)
• Using two URIs for the same thing (Thursday, 16 October)
• otiose vs odious (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• in defense of standards (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Friday, 10 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• Re: what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Thursday, 9 October)
• [sw-meaning] Agenda & Logistics for Tomorrow's Telecon (Thursday, 9 October)
• what matters is what's said, not what's meant (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Provenance/Justification (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• Re: A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)
• A bit of running code for "Tim's View" (Wednesday, 8 October)

Thomas B. Passin

• Re: Terms and statements (Thursday, 16 October)
• Re: [Fwd: consensus and ownership] (Thursday, 16 October)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: Using two URIs for the same thing (Saturday, 18 October)

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2003 13:00:07 UTC