- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 14:02:49 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-sw-meaning@w3.org
Oops, sorry. As scribe I completely messed that one. "otiose" is not a word I've come across before. (I did think "odious" seemed an odd choice of word in the conversation, but didn't have bandwidth to stop and question.) #g -- At 13:31 10/10/03 -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote: >Just to be clear, since I'm afraid some people didn't catch the >correction, Bijan was calling Tim's spec-stack argument [1] "otiose" >(pointless, superfluous, wasted) [2] not "odious" (abominable, >detestable, execrable) [3]. > > -- sandro > >[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Stack >[2] http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn1.7.1?stage=1&word=otiose >[3] http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn1.7.1?stage=1&word=odious ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2003 09:12:22 UTC