- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:38:33 -0400
- To: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
On Friday, October 10, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Just to be clear, since I'm afraid some people didn't catch the > correction, Bijan was calling Tim's spec-stack argument [1] "otiose" > (pointless, superfluous, wasted) [2] not "odious" (abominable, > detestable, execrable) [3]. And I use it with the rather more neutral connotation of "superfluous". Which I believe is how it's most commonly used and the implicatures are quite polite. No "personal" attack was made; indeed, it's unfortunate that my deliberately neutral word choice didn't survive the phone line noise. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 13:38:04 UTC