public-privacy@w3.org from April to June 2016 by author

Annette Greiner

• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)

Chaals McCathie Nevile

• Re: HTML5.1 review (Wednesday, 11 May)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Thursday, 28 April)

Christine Runnegar

• PING - informal chairs summary - 23 June 2016 (Friday, 24 June)
• PING call - 23 June 2016 at UTC 16 (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Tuesday, 7 June)
• PING @ IETF Berlin - Thursday 21 July 2016 (Tuesday, 31 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 26 May)
• Fwd: PING call - 26 May 2016 UTC 16 (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: HTML5.1 review (Tuesday, 24 May)
• PING call - pls mark your calendar (Tuesday, 3 May)
• ad-blocker detection scripts (Friday, 29 April)
• PING - IRC details for the call today (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: For your calendar - next PING call - 28 April 2016 UTC 16 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Fwd: For your calendar - next PING call - 28 April 2016 UTC 16 (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: [vibration] privacy consideration PING comments (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Monday, 11 April)
• PING - informal chairs summary - 24 March 2016 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Friday, 1 April)

Craig Spiezle

• RE: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Sunday, 24 April)

David (Standards) Singer

• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: PING - informal chairs summary - 24 March 2016 (Monday, 4 April)

David Singer

• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Monday, 25 April)
• UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Friday, 22 April)

Dawson Frank (Nokia-TECH/Irving)

• IWPE'16 Privacy Engineering Workshop on May 26th, San Jose (Sunday, 1 May)

Eric Stephan

• Re: PING call - 23 June 2016 at UTC 16 sending regrets (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Friday, 29 April)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: Privacy report on sensors, for generic sensors API. (Friday, 8 April)

Greg Norcie

• webRTC looking for feedback from PING (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Monday, 6 June)
• "Advertisers Might Already Be Using Your Phone’s Hardware to Track You" (Tuesday, 31 May)
• "Online Tracking - A 1 Million-site measurment and analysis" (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: HTML5.1 review (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 24 May)
• Re: HTML5.1 review (Thursday, 12 May)
• Re: HTML5.1 review (Wednesday, 11 May)
• strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: PING - informal chairs summary - 24 March 2016 (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: Privacy report on sensors, for generic sensors API. (Sunday, 3 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Friday, 1 April)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Friday, 22 April)
• Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Thursday, 21 April)

Ilya Grigorik

• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Tuesday, 7 June)
• [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Wednesday, 1 June)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Saturday, 2 April)

Joseph Lorenzo Hall

• Re: PING call - 23 June 2016 at UTC 16 sending regrets (Wednesday, 22 June)
• regrets for next week from CDT... (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [review] Performance APIs, Security and Privacy (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: PING call - 26 May 2016 UTC 16 (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: ad-blocker detection scripts (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: Web Payments FPWDs published -- seeking early PING review (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: ad-blocker detection scripts (Friday, 29 April)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Thursday, 28 April)
• Re: For your calendar - next PING call - 28 April 2016 UTC 16 (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Monday, 25 April)
• Fwd: [encrypted-media] Privacy: Prohibit access/use of sensitive data (e.g. location) by CDMs (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Monday, 11 April)

Keiji Takeda

• PING call - 28 July 2016 at UTC 16 (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: Fwd: PING call - 26 May 2016 UTC 16 (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: Fwd: For your calendar - next PING call - 28 April 2016 UTC 16 (Tuesday, 26 April)

Lukasz Olejnik (W3C)

• Re: [vibration] privacy consideration PING comments (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Privacy report on sensors, for generic sensors API. (Saturday, 9 April)
• Re: Privacy report on sensors, for generic sensors API. (Tuesday, 5 April)
• Re: Privacy report on sensors, for generic sensors API. (Friday, 1 April)

Léonie Watson

• RE: HTML5.1 review (Wednesday, 25 May)
• HTML5.1 review (Tuesday, 10 May)

Mark Lizar

• London Trust & Consent Event May 27th: An advanced look at the trust marketplace (Monday, 16 May)
• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Sunday, 24 April)

Mike O'Neill

• RE: ad-blocker detection scripts (Tuesday, 3 May)
• RE: ad-blocker detection scripts (Monday, 2 May)

Nick Doty

• Sensor-based Mobile Web Fingerprinting and Cross-site Input Inference Attacks (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: PING call - 26 May 2016 UTC 16 (Thursday, 26 May)
• Fwd: Webmention WD (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: strategies for getting more eyes on new standards (Tuesday, 3 May)
• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Sunday, 24 April)
• Re: Verifying the disposition of responses to PING originated comments on “Media Capture and Streams” (Tuesday, 19 April)

Peter Schoo

• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Saturday, 23 April)

Phil Archer

• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Thursday, 26 May)
• Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Wednesday, 25 May)
• Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices (Tuesday, 24 May)

Robert Sanderson

• Re: Privacy review request: Web Annotation model and protocol (Friday, 22 April)

Shane M Wiley

• Re: UK’s upper House urges privacy kitemark for online platforms | TechCrunch (Monday, 25 April)

Stefan Håkansson LK

• Re: Verifying the disposition of responses to PING originated comments on “Media Capture and Streams” (Thursday, 14 April)

Tara Whalen

• PING – informal chairs’ summary – 26 May 2016 (Thursday, 23 June)
• PING – informal chairs summary – 28 April 2016 (Thursday, 26 May)

Last message date: Friday, 24 June 2016 23:07:45 UTC