Re: HTML5.1 review

Hello Léonie,

Thanks for reaching out!

As a first, step, could you or someone from the HTML5 team please use the
PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an initial self review of your
standard? (We would also love to get feedback on how the privacy
questionnaire can be improved :) )

I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining
issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self
review.

There is a PING call on 5/26 - perhaps you could report back to us with the
results of your self review at that time, and we could help your team work
through any remaining issues that you are unclear how to move forward on?

[1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/

/********************************************/
Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
District of Columbia office
(p) 202-637-9800
PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt

/*******************************************/

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

> Christine & Tara,
>
> We are preparing to move HTML5.1 to CR by mid-June, and would welcome a
> review by the Privacy IG  ahead of that transition.
>
> There is a stable WD available [1], with incremental changes noted within
> the specification itself [2]. The more fluid editors draft is also
> available
> [3].
>
> If there is anything I can do to help, please don't hesitate to ask.
>
> Léonie on behalf of the WP chairs and team.
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/changes.html#changes
> [3] https://w3c.github.io/html/
>
> --
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
>
>
>
>
>