- From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:55:19 -0700
- To: norcie@cdt.org
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, "public-dwbp-comments@w3.org" <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMFz4ji1c4HuKBmThH8SZmoP+3aE647EA=sid1i16v2BSFh2sg@mail.gmail.com>
All, Here is a view only spreadsheet [1] that I promised to start compiling questionaire information to assess the DWBP document. I've granted read/write access to the Phil, the BP editors, Annette Greiner who is a major contributor. If you would like editing access let me know. I alerted Greg to the fact that in order to put some questions into spreadsheet form I reduced or altered wording. If the meaning is changed please recommend something more suitable. Thanks, Eric Stephan References [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Cr6b313LzFa4Y8ImlMJila8zRsN54_ekAZTycK7tchQ/edit?usp=sharing On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Phil, > > >>Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss this > a bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped > the details below: > > +1 > > Eric S > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote: > >> Hi Phil, >> >> Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss this a >> bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped the >> details below: >> >> >> Privacy Interest Group Meetings >> Next call: 26th May 2016 >> 9am PT, 12pm ET, 6pm CET >> >> WebEx meeting >> >> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=meda7c1b71d647aefa4377d4610c67648 >> >> +1 617-324-0000 >> meeting number: 648 986 475 >> >> Please also join us in IRC in the #privacy room. >> Server: irc.w3.org >> Username: <your name> >> Port: 6667 or 6665 >> Channel: #privacy >> >> https://www.w3.org/Privacy/ >> >> >> /********************************************/ >> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org) >> Staff Technologist >> Center for Democracy & Technology >> District of Columbia office >> (p) 202-637-9800 >> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt >> >> /*******************************************/ >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Looks like you got that gig then, Eric - thank you! >>> >>> As you know, Eric, it's the privacy issues that you raised about data >>> and metadata that are the potential overlap. I don't imagine the PING folks >>> will have a lot to say about persistent identifiers, API calls etc. so I >>> hope that we can minimise what we're asking Greg and his colleagues to do. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Phil. >>> >>> >>> On 24/05/2016 20:41, Eric Stephan wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Greg, Phil, and DWBP WG, >>>> >>>> It almost seems like a matrix (table) of privacy questions and the best >>>> practices would be useful, blank cells could reflect non-applicability. >>>> What do you think? If it is useful, I am happy to help. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> >>>> Eric Stephan >>>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Phil, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline. >>>>> >>>>> In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone >>>>> from >>>>> the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an >>>>> initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get >>>>> feedback >>>>> on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) ) >>>>> >>>>> I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining >>>>> issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self >>>>> review. >>>>> >>>>> There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and >>>>> discuss further. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /********************************************/ >>>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org) >>>>> Staff Technologist >>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology >>>>> District of Columbia office >>>>> (p) 202-637-9800 >>>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt >>>>> >>>>> /*******************************************/ >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Ping members, >>>>>> >>>>>> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three >>>>>> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be grateful >>>>>> if >>>>>> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this work >>>>>> but: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references >>>>>> to >>>>>> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment >>>>>> [2]. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy >>>>>> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity >>>>>> vocabulary." >>>>>> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you >>>>>> could >>>>>> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I >>>>>> think it >>>>>> unlikely but I may be missing something). >>>>>> >>>>>> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is Rec >>>>>> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on >>>>>> comments of 12 June. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your help, >>>>>> >>>>>> Phil. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro >>>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment >>>>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination >>>>>> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/ >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Phil Archer >>>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >>>>>> >>>>>> http://philarcher.org >>>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>>>>> @philarcher1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Phil Archer >>> W3C Data Activity Lead >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ >>> >>> http://philarcher.org >>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>> @philarcher1 >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 15:55:48 UTC