Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices

Annette,

>I do want to make sure we bear in
> mind that the group is not attempting to write BPs for privacy or other
> legal considerations. We felt it was out of scope to try and really
address
> such things.

Yes I completely agree.  The questions Greg put together are really food
for thought about what a publisher needs to consider in terms of privacy.
One particular aspect that I really like is having the courtesy to let
individuals know when their privacy information is being used, if there are
constraints such as time limits on how long individual privacy information
can be retained etc.

I'll send out more later,

Kind regards,

Eric S.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org> wrote:

> Hi Annette!
>
> No, we just look for privacy problems with web specifications... more soon!
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for putting this together, Eric! I do want to make sure we bear in
> > mind that the group is not attempting to write BPs for privacy or other
> > legal considerations. We felt it was out of scope to try and really
> address
> > such things. If the PING feels this is something we should take on,
> however,
> > I certainly hope they will let us know that.
> >
> > -Annette
> >
> >
> > On 5/25/16 8:55 AM, Eric Stephan wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Here is a view only spreadsheet [1] that I promised to start compiling
> > questionaire information to assess the DWBP document.  I've granted
> > read/write access to the Phil, the BP editors, Annette Greiner who is a
> > major contributor.  If you would like editing access let me know.
> >
> > I alerted Greg to the fact that in order to put some questions into
> > spreadsheet form I reduced or altered wording.  If the meaning is changed
> > please recommend something more suitable.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Eric Stephan
> >
> > References
> > [1]
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Cr6b313LzFa4Y8ImlMJila8zRsN54_ekAZTycK7tchQ/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Hi Phil,
> >>
> >> >>Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss
> this
> >> >> a bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've
> C/Ped the
> >> >> details below:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Eric S
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Phil,
> >>>
> >>> Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss
> this a
> >>> bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped
> the
> >>> details below:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Privacy Interest Group Meetings
> >>>   Next call: 26th May 2016
> >>>   9am PT, 12pm ET, 6pm CET
> >>>
> >>>      WebEx meeting
> >>>
> >>> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=meda7c1b71d647aefa4377d4610c67648
> >>>
> >>>      +1 617-324-0000
> >>>      meeting number: 648 986 475
> >>>
> >>> Please also join us in IRC in the #privacy room.
> >>>      Server: irc.w3.org
> >>>      Username: <your name>
> >>>      Port: 6667 or 6665
> >>>      Channel: #privacy
> >>>
> >>> https://www.w3.org/Privacy/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> /********************************************/
> >>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
> >>> Staff Technologist
> >>> Center for Democracy & Technology
> >>> District of Columbia office
> >>> (p) 202-637-9800
> >>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
> >>>
> >>> /*******************************************/
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like you got that gig then, Eric - thank you!
> >>>>
> >>>> As you know, Eric, it's the privacy issues that you raised about data
> >>>> and metadata that are the potential overlap. I don't imagine the PING
> folks
> >>>> will have a lot to say about persistent identifiers, API calls etc.
> so I
> >>>> hope that we can minimise what we're asking Greg and his colleagues
> to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Phil.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/05/2016 20:41, Eric Stephan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Greg, Phil, and DWBP WG,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It almost seems like a matrix (table) of privacy questions and the
> best
> >>>>> practices would be useful, blank cells could reflect
> non-applicability.
> >>>>> What do you think?  If it is useful, I am happy to help.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Eric Stephan
> >>>>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Phil,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>> the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an
> >>>>>> initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get
> >>>>>> feedback
> >>>>>> on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) )
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any
> remaining
> >>>>>> issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the
> self
> >>>>>> review.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and
> >>>>>> discuss further.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> /********************************************/
> >>>>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
> >>>>>> Staff Technologist
> >>>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
> >>>>>> District of Columbia office
> >>>>>> (p) 202-637-9800
> >>>>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> /*******************************************/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dear Ping members,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published
> three
> >>>>>>> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be
> grateful
> >>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this
> work
> >>>>>>> but:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has
> references
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment
> >>>>>>> [2].
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy
> >>>>>>> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity
> >>>>>>> vocabulary."
> >>>>>>> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if
> you
> >>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I
> >>>>>>> think it
> >>>>>>> unlikely but I may be missing something).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is
> >>>>>>> Rec
> >>>>>>> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline
> on
> >>>>>>> comments of 12 June.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thank you for your help,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Phil.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro
> >>>>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment
> >>>>>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination
> >>>>>>> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Phil Archer
> >>>>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
> >>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://philarcher.org
> >>>>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
> >>>>>>> @philarcher1
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Phil Archer
> >>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> >>>>
> >>>> http://philarcher.org
> >>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
> >>>> @philarcher1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Annette Greiner
> > NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph Lorenzo Hall
> Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org
> ]
> 1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497
> e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
> Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
>