Fwd: Webmention WD

I think the Webmention draft, from the Social Web Working Group, would be a good one for the Privacy folks to review. The draft doesn't currently have a privacy considerations section.

Webmentions are, in a sense, a way of federating comments around the Web, so there are also likely to be implications for discussion of harassment/annotation.

I have some comments on security (specifically, DDoS mitigation) that I should also review for this draft; I could add those to any compiled privacy/security comments from this list.

Cheers,
Nick

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
> Subject: Webmention WD
> Date: May 3, 2016 at 9:38:10 AM PT
> To: public-review-announce@w3.org
> Cc: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
> Resent-From: public-review-announce@w3.org
> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAGBSGjrFNROZBT4fVg-WzqyktTJL3cKuOd9czcWM_-rnjG4LZw@mail.gmail>
> 
> The Social Web WG has published an updated Working Draft of the Webmention specification. The WG intends to take Webmention to CR based on this draft.
> 
>     https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/>
> 
> This update includes a link to the test suite, and a paragraph about how to submit implementation reports. Two weeks ago we hit zero open issues, and the IANA published an updated list of link relations that now includes rel=webmention.
> 
> More details on the changes are listed in the changelog:
> 
>     https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/#change-log <https://www.w3.org/TR/webmention/#change-log>
> 
> Please direct any comments to the list of issues on the Webmention GitHub repository.
> 
>     https://github.com/aaronpk/webmention/issues <https://github.com/aaronpk/webmention/issues>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aaron Parecki
> aaronparecki.com <http://aaronparecki.com/>
>