strategies for getting more eyes on new standards

Hi all,

So I've been thinking a lot about how to get more eyes on new standards
when people reach out to PING.

One possibility might be to ask spec authors (or someone from the spec's
WG) to first try using the privacy questionnaire[1] I've been working on.

This way, we can shrink the gulf of execution required to participate in
privacy reviews, as well as get some feedback from spec authors on how the
questionnaire can be improved.


What does the group think of this?

[1] https://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/

/********************************************/
Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
District of Columbia office
(p) 202-637-9800
PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt

/*******************************************/