- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 16:26:18 +0100
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
On Tue, 03 May 2016 01:40:26 +0100, Nick Doty <npdoty@ischool.berkeley.edu> wrote: > +1, I think it's useful to get feedback on the questionnaire/related > tools by asking groups to use them and then getting their feedback > explicitly or just seeing which parts are working and which aren't. > > Joe had also suggested that we have some time on an upcoming call to > talk about recruitment of participants. It might be that our group and > tools is far enough along now that we can make a more concerted effort > to having a cohort that can take turn conducting privacy reviews. I don't think we're very far along, to be honest. But maybe we can recruit people who are interested in helping us move the tools we have a bit further forward. Essentially we need to think hard about what we can do that makes it valuable for people to participate in the work. > Perhaps W3C Team can help us with making explicit requests to some of > the larger members to see if they have people that could take a turn in > a rotation to help with privacy reviews. I suspect that's not a very productive approach. Big members often have big security needs - being bigger targets - which keeps their security people busy. cheers > Cheers, > Nick > >> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> So I've been thinking a lot about how to get more eyes on new standards >> when people reach out to PING. >> >> One possibility might be to ask spec authors (or someone from the >> spec's WG) to first try using the privacy questionnaire[1] I've been >> working on. >> >> This way, we can shrink the gulf of execution required to participate >> in privacy reviews, as well as get some feedback from spec authors on >> how the questionnaire can be improved. >> >> >> What does the group think of this? >> >> [1] https://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/ >> <https://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/> >> >> /********************************************/ >> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org <mailto:norcie@cdt.org>) >> Staff Technologist >> Center for Democracy & Technology >> District of Columbia office >> (p) 202-637-9800 >> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt <http://norcie.com/pgp.txt> >> >> /*******************************************/ > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 14:26:51 UTC