- From: Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:56:31 -0400
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, "public-dwbp-comments@w3.org" <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMJgV7YX-L-uy=iKDs9HQz-BK9YdkF+dc_e4CUZWYmww-0GuUg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Phil, Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline. In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone from the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get feedback on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) ) I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self review. There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and discuss further. [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/ /********************************************/ Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org) Staff Technologist Center for Democracy & Technology District of Columbia office (p) 202-637-9800 PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt /*******************************************/ On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Dear Ping members, > > The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three > documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be grateful if > you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this work but: > > 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references to > privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment [2]. > > 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy > concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity vocabulary." > The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you could > confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I think it > unlikely but I may be missing something). > > The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is Rec > Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on > comments of 12 June. > > Thank you for your help, > > Phil. > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro > [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment > [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination > [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/ > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 18:57:20 UTC