W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > April to June 2016

Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices

From: Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:56:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMJgV7YX-L-uy=iKDs9HQz-BK9YdkF+dc_e4CUZWYmww-0GuUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>, "public-dwbp-comments@w3.org" <public-dwbp-comments@w3.org>
Hi Phil,

Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline.

In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone from
the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an
initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get feedback
on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) )

I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining
issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self

There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and
discuss further.

[1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/

Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
District of Columbia office
(p) 202-637-9800
PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt


On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Dear Ping members,
> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three
> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be grateful if
> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this work but:
> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references to
> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment [2].
> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy
> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity vocabulary."
> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you could
> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I think it
> unlikely but I may be missing something).
> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is Rec
> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on
> comments of 12 June.
> Thank you for your help,
> Phil.
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination
> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/
> --
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 18:57:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:49:33 UTC