Re: Request for review of Data on the Web Best Practices

Thanks Eric,

Can you let me know when you're done? Then I can take a look and better
judge how (if at all) the rewording changed things.

While I respect your initative, it might be better to finalize the
checklist before we make a matrix out of it rather than develop in parallel.


/********************************************/
Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
Staff Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
District of Columbia office
(p) 202-637-9800
PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt

/*******************************************/

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Here is a view only spreadsheet [1] that I promised to start compiling
> questionaire information to assess the DWBP document.  I've granted
> read/write access to the Phil, the BP editors, Annette Greiner who is a
> major contributor.  If you would like editing access let me know.
>
> I alerted Greg to the fact that in order to put some questions into
> spreadsheet form I reduced or altered wording.  If the meaning is changed
> please recommend something more suitable.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eric Stephan
>
> References
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Cr6b313LzFa4Y8ImlMJila8zRsN54_ekAZTycK7tchQ/edit?usp=sharing
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Hi Phil,
>>
>> >>Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss this
>> a bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped
>> the details below:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Eric S
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Also wanted to say - if you want to join the PING call and discuss this
>>> a bit in a less asynchronous manner, it's happening tomorrow, I've C/Ped
>>> the details below:
>>>
>>>
>>> Privacy Interest Group Meetings
>>>   Next call: 26th May 2016
>>>   9am PT, 12pm ET, 6pm CET
>>>
>>>      WebEx meeting
>>>
>>> https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=meda7c1b71d647aefa4377d4610c67648
>>>
>>>      +1 617-324-0000
>>>      meeting number: 648 986 475
>>>
>>> Please also join us in IRC in the #privacy room.
>>>      Server: irc.w3.org
>>>      Username: <your name>
>>>      Port: 6667 or 6665
>>>      Channel: #privacy
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/Privacy/
>>>
>>>
>>> /********************************************/
>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
>>> Staff Technologist
>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>> District of Columbia office
>>> (p) 202-637-9800
>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
>>>
>>> /*******************************************/
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like you got that gig then, Eric - thank you!
>>>>
>>>> As you know, Eric, it's the privacy issues that you raised about data
>>>> and metadata that are the potential overlap. I don't imagine the PING folks
>>>> will have a lot to say about persistent identifiers, API calls etc. so I
>>>> hope that we can minimise what we're asking Greg and his colleagues to do.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Phil.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 24/05/2016 20:41, Eric Stephan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Greg, Phil, and DWBP WG,
>>>>>
>>>>> It almost seems like a matrix (table) of privacy questions and the best
>>>>> practices would be useful, blank cells could reflect non-applicability.
>>>>> What do you think?  If it is useful, I am happy to help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric Stephan
>>>>> Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Phil,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for reaching out! Sorry to hear about your tight deadline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In order to speed things up, as a first, step, could you or someone
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> the HTML5 team please use the PING Privacy Questionnaire[1] to do an
>>>>>> initial self review of your standard? (We would also love to get
>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>> on how the privacy questionnaire can be improved :) )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd be happy to work with you and your team to identify any remaining
>>>>>> issues that may be present in addition to those uncovered by the self
>>>>>> review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a PING call on 5/26 as well in case you want to join in and
>>>>>> discuss further.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /********************************************/
>>>>>> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
>>>>>> Staff Technologist
>>>>>> Center for Democracy & Technology
>>>>>> District of Columbia office
>>>>>> (p) 202-637-9800
>>>>>> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /*******************************************/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Ping members,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group has published three
>>>>>>> documents that are close to completion, two of which we'd be
>>>>>>> grateful if
>>>>>>> you could review. In general, privacy issues don't arise in this
>>>>>>> work but:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. The Data on the Web Best Practices document itself has references
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> privacy in its introduction [1] and in a section on data enrichment
>>>>>>> [2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. The WG's charter [3] includes the line: "Ensure that the privacy
>>>>>>> concerns are properly included in the Quality and Granularity
>>>>>>> vocabulary."
>>>>>>> The vocabulary in question is at [4] and we would be grateful if you
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> confirm that no specific privacy issues are raised by that work (I
>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>> unlikely but I may be missing something).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The WG plans to make the transition to CR for its BP doc (which is
>>>>>>> Rec
>>>>>>> Track) during next month so we're setting a (very) tight deadline on
>>>>>>> comments of 12 June.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for your help,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phil.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#intro
>>>>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-dwbp-20160519/#enrichment
>>>>>>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2013/05/odbp-charter#coordination
>>>>>>> [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-vocab-dqv-20160519/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phil Archer
>>>>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://philarcher.org
>>>>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>>>>>> @philarcher1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Phil Archer
>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>>>>
>>>> http://philarcher.org
>>>> +44 (0)7887 767755
>>>> @philarcher1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 17:36:25 UTC