- From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:05:52 -0400
- To: Peter Schoo <peter.schoo@gmx.de>
- Cc: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, David Singer <singer@mac.com>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Peter Schoo <peter.schoo@gmx.de> wrote: > >From what I've observed remotely, how the EuroPrise certification has > developed and evolved, it has been initiated and driven by folk that > were also involved in and learned from P3P and associated European > projects ... they learned ... and improved privacy validations, I'd say. > > The basic processes are defined and what privacy actually means in the > individual certification cases needs then to be fixed by two persons. > One with technical background, one with legal background. All based on > EU regulations, documented. Downside: time and money. > > It's not a fast process. Nevertheless a number of larger companies go > this way, especially for the European market. > > NB: I'm not having shares in EuroPrise. Just my observations I do wonder about the 2011 date on their criteria document... not that I reviewed that document in detail (it's big!) but just that a lot has changed in five years. best, Joe -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org] 1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497 e: joe@cdt.org, p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10 1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 21:06:39 UTC