public-esw-thes@w3.org from August 2004 by subject

[Action][SKOS Mapping] moved to W3 namespace

[Action][SKOS-Core] handling top concepts

[Action][SKOS-Core] Initial term_status values

[Action][SKOS-Core] minor - added dct:issued props for all terms

[Action][SKOS-Core] Technical changes and XML comment updated

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] Collections

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] handling top concepts

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] handling top concepts - original use ca se

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] Local (non-URI) identifiers for concept s: support for concepts in multiple schemes

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] Local (non-URI) identifiers for concepts

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] Moving semantic relation property extensions to an 'extensions' vocab.

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] New vocab for arrays of concepts

[Proposal][SKOS-Core] Some DC extensions around dc:subject

[Requirement][SKOS-Core] Arrays of concepts

[Requirement][SKOS-Core] Arrays of concepts: further issues

[Requirement][SKOS-Core] handling top concepts

[Requirement][SKOS-Core] Local (non-URI) identifiers for concepts

[Requirementl][SKOS-Core] Collections

Concept schemes and the models that describe them ...

Discussion issue: should semantic relation statements be memb ers of concept schemes?

Discussion issue: should semantic relation statements be members of concept schemes?

reference: a challenge for skos

Scheme versioning & change management

SKOS home page

SKOS meets Semantic blogging (again)?

SKOS Validator

SKOS-Core Migration Guidelines

SkosDev DataZone

SkosDev ToolShed

wordpress categories -> skos

Last message date: Friday, 27 August 2004 19:40:10 UTC