- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:27:00 +0100
- To: 'Dan Brickley' <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
> Thanks, this identifies a discomfort I've had w/ interactions between > 'top concept' notion and thesaurus mixing. At heart you're saying > 'top concept' is a relation between a a scheme/dataset/thesaurus and > a concept. Makes sense to me. > > So would this be: > > <owl:FunctionalProperty > rdf:about="http:///....../skos/core#hasTopConcept"/> > > ie. anything that has a skos:hasTopConcept has only one such thing? > Thanks Dan. The original idea was that a scheme has several skos:hasTopConcept properties, pointing to the top level concepts for that scheme (i.e. so not functional). If we made skos:hasTopConcept functional, each scheme would have to be defined with a single root concept ... do you think it's worth doing it that way? Al.
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:27:55 UTC