- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:46:18 -0400
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: 'Morten Frederiksen' <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>, public-esw@w3.org, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>, dino@w3.org
* Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2004-08-16 11:45-0400] > > * Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-08-16 14:15+0100] > > > > Nice work :) > > > > Re SKOS Mapping, have you got any suggestions for changes or new features? > > > > SKOS Core is getting all the attention right now, but I'm happy to do > > changes to SKOS Mapping too if they get consensus on the list. > > Proposal: > > (dropping the 'has-' idiom in the label, though just my taste...) > > <rdf:Property rdf:ID="approximate Match"> oops, meant to type "approximateMatch". > <rdfs:label>appropximate match</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="#mappingRelation"/> > <rdfs:comment>If concept A has (an) 'approximinate match' to some > concept B then typically a majority of resources that have concept > A as a (dc:)subject will also have concept B as their (dc:)subject, and > vice-versa. This relationship indicates a general, if ill-defined, > strong similarity between two SKOS concepts.</rdfs:comment> > </rdf:Property> > > I have a use case for this, in mapping between the SKOS concepts in > my personal weblog with those from others I contribute to, eg. SWAD-E > and FOAF. > > (BTW I checked the behaviour of Wordpress w.r.t. deleting categories; it > seems to take care _not_ to re-assign its numeric identifiers to > subsequently created new categories). > > cheers, > > Dan
Received on Monday, 16 August 2004 15:46:19 UTC