- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:56:51 -0400
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
* Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> [2004-08-10 16:47+0100] > > I came across this just now ... > > http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000589.html > > ... interesting. Thanks for this. I'm inclined to agree with his conclusion, which is that we're not trying to solve the same problem. I wonder if we should say something like this in the Web somewhere? eg.: SKOS represents thesaurus-like data structures in an explicit and extensible format. While these structures might be useful resources for researchers engaged in automatic classification, parsing/interpreting unstructured text, Natural Language Processing, etc., SKOS is not expected to solve the difficult problems associated with mapping from a stream of characters to a structure which normalises them into references to uniquely identified 'concepts'. Machine interpretation of human-generated text is related to the general problems of artificial intelligence (eg. common sense reasoning, background knowledge, etc), ie. a known 'very hard problem'. SKOS attempts to address an easier problem space: data sharing amongst thesaurus-based applications. It does not make any grand claims regarding the utility of home-grown or specialist-maintained thesauri in everyday and scientific life, beyond noting that they are widely used and that the lack of a modern, Web-friendly data model and syntax has hampered the exchange and mapping of thesaurus datasets, and their use in Web applications. Bit wordy, maybe? Dan > Short extract: > > ... the authors of SKOS are trying to solve a different problem, namely how > to let people who are putting explicit semantics in their web documents do > so in a way that allows for variable concept labels and partly-related > alternative conceptual schemata. Fine -- but some people may think that this > will help to represent the content of the ordinary-language documents that > ordinary folk write, especially when the documents are scientific or > technical in character. But it won't. > > > --- > Alistair Miles > Research Associate > CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Building R1 Room 1.60 > Fermi Avenue > Chilton > Didcot > Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > United Kingdom > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 August 2004 17:56:51 UTC