public-device-apis@w3.org from June 2015 by author

Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Provide a way of tying sensor requests to animation frames (Thursday, 11 June)

davidmarkclements via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Friday, 5 June)

Device APIs Working Group Issue Tracker

• DAP-ACTION-737: Chat with geo chair and staff contact on future of device orientaiton (Thursday, 25 June)
• DAP-ACTION-736: Send cfc for wd publication for ambient light and proximity once drafts available (Thursday, 25 June)
• DAP-ACTION-735: Create editor drafts for ambient light and proximity indicating new approach toward generic sensor api, also drafts for publication to tr space (Thursday, 25 June)
• DAP-ACTION-734: Contact mozilla and microsoft re interest in implementing html media capture vs shelving (Thursday, 25 June)
• DAP-ACTION-733: Discuss generic sensor api and use of eventtarget in geolocation wg to summarize issues to dap (Thursday, 11 June)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] getAll()? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] SensorIdentifier is bizarre (Monday, 8 June)
• [sensors] SensorIdentifier is bizarre (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Add a threshold option (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [sensors] Identify the lower level primitives that do the actual sensor polling. (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [sensors] What if requested polling frequency is > time it takes to read data out of the sensor? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [sensors] What if requested polling frequency is > time it takes to read data out of the sensor? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [sensors] "wakeup" parameter (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Thursday, 18 June)
• DAP rechartering (Thursday, 18 June)

Frederick Hirsch

• draft minutes 25 June 2015 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: [wake-lock] Wake Lock API Status request (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Fwd: DAP rechartering (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 25 June 2015 (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [proximity/light] Way forward for Proximity/Light APIs (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [wake-lock] Wake Lock API Status request (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [html-media-capture] HTML Media Capture Status and Update Request (Tuesday, 23 June)
• [Battery] Battery Status & Update request (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Friday, 19 June)
• CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: TPAC breakout session for the Generic Sensor API? (was: TPAC 2015 Registration Now Open) (Monday, 15 June)
• Draft minutes from today's call 11 June 2015 (Thursday, 11 June)
• reminder - using WebEx for today's DAP call (Thursday, 11 June)
• TPAC 2015 Registration Now Open (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 11 June 2015 (Tuesday, 9 June)

gmandyam via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Handle sensor fusion (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Handle sensor fusion (Wednesday, 10 June)

Jafar Husain via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)

Kostiainen, Anssi

• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 25 June 2015 (Thursday, 25 June)
• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Monday, 22 June)
• TPAC breakout session for the Generic Sensor API? (was: TPAC 2015 Registration Now Open) (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)

Kris Kowal via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)

Marcos Caceres via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Updated proposal for Sensor API (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Updated proposal for Sensor API (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [sensors] Use <dfn> tag for "read from the sensor" (Wednesday, 10 June)

Matthew Podwysocki via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)

Nick Doty

• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Friday, 19 June)
• Re: CfC to Shelve DAP Permissions API (Thursday, 18 June)

pablochacin via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Friday, 5 June)

Rick Waldron via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Use double WebIDL type instead of float. (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [sensors] getAll()? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• [sensors] frequency is a float? (Monday, 8 June)
• [sensors] getAll()? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Sunday, 7 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: [sensors] Identify the lower level primitives that do the actual sensor polling. (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [sensors] "wakeup" parameter (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)

Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] [TreatNonObjectAsNull] not required? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• [sensors] [TreatNonObjectAsNull] not required? (Tuesday, 9 June)

robman via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Handle sensor fusion (Thursday, 11 June)

Tobie Langel

• Re: [proximity/light] Way forward for Proximity/Light APIs (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 25 June 2015 (Wednesday, 24 June)
• Re: TPAC breakout session for the Generic Sensor API? (was: TPAC 2015 Registration Now Open) (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - DAP Distributed Meeting 11 June 2015 (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Initial ED of the Generic Sensor API (Monday, 8 June)

Tobie Langel via GitHub

• [sensors] Add a section on how sensors are implemented (Thursday, 18 June)
• [sensors] Add a definitions section to the spec (Thursday, 18 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Tuesday, 16 June)
• [sensors] Address questions around exposing high-level, low-level, and uncalibrated sensors (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 11 June)
• [sensors] Is a Promise-returning, "oneshot" method useful? (Thursday, 11 June)
• [sensors] Does `SensorObserver` need a stop() method? (Thursday, 11 June)
• [sensors] Ability to lookup a cached SensorReading without polling the sensor (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] API must allow Web devs to easily create fused sensors in JS with an API consistant with native sensors (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Handle sensor fusion (Thursday, 11 June)
• [sensors] Add a timeout property? (Thursday, 11 June)
• [sensors] Add high resolution monotonic timestamps to SensorReadings (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] fixing typos (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Thursday, 11 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [sensors] Handle sensor fusion (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [sensors] Handle sensor fusion (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [sensors] Credit where credit is due. (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [sensors] Make APIs forward-compatible with ES modules (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Closed: [sensors] frequency is a float? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Closed: [sensors] [TreatNonObjectAsNull] not required? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [sensors] Use <dfn> tag for "read from the sensor" (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [sensors] getAll()? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [sensors] [TreatNonObjectAsNull] not required? (Tuesday, 9 June)
• Re: [sensors] getAll()? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Simplify extension of the Permissions API for concrete sensor implementations (Monday, 8 June)
• Closed: [sensors] SensorIdentifier is bizarre (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] SensorIdentifier is bizarre (Monday, 8 June)
• [sensors] Do we need a lightweight interface representing available sensors? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Monday, 8 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Saturday, 6 June)
• Re: [sensors] Fix mixed-content problem with URL to respec (Saturday, 6 June)
• [sensors] When there are multiple sensors of a given type, how do we identify which one to instantiate? (Friday, 5 June)
• [sensors] Add a threshold option (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Friday, 5 June)
• [sensors] Identify the lower level primitives that do the actual sensor polling. (Friday, 5 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Thursday, 4 June)
• [sensors] What if requested polling frequency is > time it takes to read data out of the sensor? (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [sensors] "wakeup" parameter (Wednesday, 3 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Wednesday, 3 June)

zenparsing via GitHub

• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Friday, 12 June)
• Re: [sensors] Dependency on [DOM] due to inheriting from EventTarget (Tuesday, 2 June)

Zhang, Zhiqiang

• RE: [Battery] Battery Status & Update request (Wednesday, 24 June)

Андрей Логвинов

• Re: [wake-lock] Wake Lock API Status request (Thursday, 25 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 25 June 2015 15:04:24 UTC