public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org from October 2006 by author

Jason T. Greene

• RE: Header blocks in wrpc:signature (Friday, 20 October)

Jeremy Hughes

• Re: service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames (Tuesday, 17 October)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: URI comparison (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: Part 2, 5.6.3 XML Representation of subcodes is inconsistent (Tuesday, 31 October)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to identify an element (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Header blocks in wrpc:signature (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent (Friday, 20 October)
• CR080: Canonical component designators? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: {rpc signature} REQUIRED when rpc style is not specified? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Fragment identifier syntax not XPointer Framework-compatible (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Suggested editorial changes for IRI and Multipart styles (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Assetions covered by schema validation (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Suggested editorial changes to adjuncts section 4.1.1 wrpc:signature (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Request 2 clarifications for RPC style (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 part 2 comment - 2.3.x, 2.2.x wording problems (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Request 2 clarifications for RPC style (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Deconstructing MEPs (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: {http cookies} REQUIRED? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: {http cookies} REQUIRED? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Endpoint component {name} property vs xml representation as a QName (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Prefix declarations in inlined schema (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: service and binding name shown as QNames in example - should be NCNames (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Why don't whttp:authenticationType and {http authentication scheme} match? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited} appear? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: when does wsoap:code appear? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: When does {safety} appear? (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Inline schemas with no target namespace (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute (Tuesday, 10 October)
• RE: Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 (Tuesday, 10 October)
• RE: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 (Tuesday, 10 October)

Matthew Rawlings

• RE: XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to identify an element (Friday, 20 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2006 01:00:17 UTC