W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2006

RE: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments

From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:49:33 -0700
To: "'Daniel Barclay'" <daniel@fgm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006101c6f491$a1eb3760$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR065 [1].

Changes as detailed below are reflected in the latest draft [2].

Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR065
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.html

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Barclay
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 6:58 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments
> 
> 
> I wrote:
> >
> > The WSDL 2.0 Primer CR contains a number of editorial errors:
> > ...
> 
> Also:
> 
> * Section 5.5.1 says:
> 
>      All relationships in WSDL 2.0 (like an Operation belonging to an
>      Interface ...) are ...
> 
> That should be:
> 
>      All relationships in WSDL 2.0 (like an Operation's belonging to an
>      Interface ...) are ...
> 
> (It's not the Operation itself but its belonging (again, note the
> possessive word before the word "belonging") that is the relationship.)
> 

fixed

> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 21:49:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT