RE: Prefix declarations in inlined schema

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR063 [1].

The Working Group agreed that reading the sentence literally was misleading,
but opted for a simple fix, prepending "Conceptually" to the sentence.  This
has been implemented in the latest editor's draft [2].

Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR063
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?content-
type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#inlining-xsd

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeremy Hughes
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 2:44 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Prefix declarations in inlined schema
> 
> 
> Hi, section 3.1.2 of part 1 [1] says about inlining XML schema:
> 
> "It may be viewed as simply cutting and pasting an existing schema
> document to a location inside the types element information item."
> 
> Doing this could mean a namespace declaration, declared in the
> enclosing <description> is redeclared in the <schema> element. Of
> course, this won't be a problem - I'm more interested in the case
> where the inlined schema relies on the enclosing <description>'s
> namespace declarations. Meaning the <schema> uses prefixes only
> declared in the enclosing <description> element. So ...
> 
> Is it necessary to respecify namespace declarations already specified
> in the enclosing WSDL or do the default scoping rules apply?
> 
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?conten
> t-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#inlining-xsd
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeremy