RE: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
issue as a CR041 [1].

 

The Working Group agreed with the sentiment, but found that the assertion in
the latest editor's draft [2] covers this adequately, so no change to the
spec was deemed necessary.

 

Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you
agree with the resolution of this issue.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR041

[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html
?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-headers-decl-relate

 

Jonathan Marsh  -   <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com  -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

  _____  

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 7:14 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2

 


In the {http headers} property, is the {name} of the HTTP Header component,
a key? i.e., is each HTTP Header component in {http headers} uniquely
identified by it's {name}? 

This is implied by 6.5.6 IRI Identification Of An HTTP Header component
which uses the {name} in the frag id, so it had better be unique. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca