Saturday, 29 September 2001
- xsi:type and xs:all : second test case, same players, different errors.
- xs:any / xsi:type == 1 repro case for 3 validators (xerces, xml spy and xsv)
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: xsd:choice
- Re: Problem with Chameleon include and latest XSV
- XBuilder - Schema Editor
Friday, 28 September 2001
Thursday, 27 September 2001
Friday, 28 September 2001
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Announce: Schema Genarator in GEFEG EDIFIX(R)
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
Thursday, 27 September 2001
- RE: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Re: Identity contraint specification, backwards compatibility...
- Re: Default namespaces and <includes>
- Identity contraint specification, backwards compatibility...
- Re: Typo in the schema for schema.
- Default namespaces and <includes>
- [Fwd: schema usage]
- MS SQL Server DateTime Type
- Re: nillable values for attributes
- Re: using namespaces in xmlschema
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
- Re: using namespaces in xmlschema
- Re: Differences, Backward compatibility
- Re: nillable values for attributes
- Re: XML schema supports conditional structure???
- Re: New to Schema
- Typo in the schema for schema.
- Differences, Backward compatibility
- nillable values for attributes
- Re: XML schema supports conditional structure???
- New to Schema
- Re: XML schema supports conditional structure???
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
- Re: grammer with uri not found
- Re: Migrating regular expression from "http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema" version
- RE: Migrating regular expression from "http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema" version
- Migrating regular expression from "http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema" version
- Re: Namespaces
- how do I express this content model?
- Namespaces
- RE: XML-Schema Validator Problems
- grammer with uri not found
- tool to generate xsd file from a database table
- Re: XML-Schema Validator Problems
Monday, 24 September 2001
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- using namespaces in xmlschema
- Schema Genarator in GEFEG EDIFIX(R)
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- Constant instances in XML schema ?
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- Re: key/keyref problem and XSV
- key/keyref problem and XSV
Sunday, 23 September 2001
Friday, 21 September 2001
- Re: are schemas backward compatible?
- XML schema supports conditional structure???
- are schemas backward compatible?
- Re: XML-Schema Validator Problems
- Re: XML Schema Implementation
- Re: XML Schema Implementation
- Re: XML Schema Implementation
- XML-Schema Validator Problems
- XML Schema Implementation
Thursday, 20 September 2001
- XMLSchema stylesheet 4 U
- Re: Relative path in Include Element
- Re: wildcard
- RE: csv as a xml-schema datatype?
- Re: wildcard
- Re: wildcard
- Allowing *any* text in an element (long example included)
- Re: wildcard
- Re: wildcard
- Re: wildcard
- wildcard
- Re: Restricting the schema for schemas
- Re: equivalent of marked sections?
- Re: w3c web-based validator broke.. :(
- Re: Relative path in Include Element
- w3c web-based validator broke.. :(
Wednesday, 19 September 2001
- equivalent of marked sections?
- Re: Trying to prove a schema works, by breaking it..
- RE: Restricting the schema for schemas
- Restricting the schema for schemas
- RE: Trying to prove a schema works, by breaking it..
- Relative path in Include Element
- Trying to prove a schema works, by breaking it..
- RE: csv as a xml-schema datatype?
- RE: Empty Content Element Declaration Problem
- Empty Content Element Declaration Problem
- csv as a xml-schema datatype?
Monday, 17 September 2001
Friday, 14 September 2001
- Re: How can I get xml.xsd 2000/10 version?
- How can I get xml.xsd 2000/10 version?
- Re: ANN: Sun's XML Datatypes Library
- Re[2]: Is this <xs:unique> correct?
- Re: Derivation from simple content to complex contnet vice versa
- Re: Derivation from simple content to complex contnet vice versa
- Re: Conditional-processing im Schema
- Re: Is this <xs:unique> correct?
- Re: SimpleType/restriction ?
- Re: Allowing empty element content
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
Thursday, 13 September 2001
Friday, 14 September 2001
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
Friday, 14 September 2001
Thursday, 13 September 2001
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
- Re: managing unknown values
- Re: managing unknown values
- Re: managing unknown values
- Re: Schema (20010502) Validator problem
- Schema (20010502) Validator problem
- Re: xml in appinfo annotations in validated schema
Monday, 10 September 2001
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
Monday, 10 September 2001
- Re: Simple type cannot be used in a derivation by RESTRICTION for a complexType.
- Re: managing unknown values
- ANNOUNCE: Final Release of the new XML Spy 4.0 Suite is now avail able
- RE: managing unknown values
- Re: managing unknown values
- RE: managing unknown values
- Re: managing unknown values
- Re: HELP: Need At-Least-One model, and CDATA element type
- RE: managing unknown values
- managing unknown values
- Re: HELP: Need At-Least-One model, and CDATA element type
- Re: First Release of the W3C XML Schema Test Collection
Friday, 7 September 2001
Monday, 10 September 2001
Friday, 7 September 2001
Monday, 10 September 2001
Saturday, 8 September 2001
Friday, 7 September 2001
- Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax W3C Working Draft
- Using xml:lang as an <attribute> name
- Re: Need At-Least-One model, and CDATA element type
- Comparaison/Interest of RDF/XML schema ?
- First Release of the W3C XML Schema Test Collection
- Re: HELP: Need At-Least-One model, and CDATA element type
Thursday, 6 September 2001
- HELP: Need At-Least-One model, and CDATA element type
- Re: Restricting values for a group of elements
- Re: restriction can have simple type content though base attribute is required?
- Restricting values for a group of elements
- help required for xml-Schema parser
- [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- extending xsd:element attributes - again
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
- Re: restriction can have simple type content though base attribute is required?
- restriction can have simple type content though base attribute is required?
- Re: XMl schema - restricting contents to "mobile phone numbers" -- starting with 2 specific digits
- Re: local <group>
- local <group>
- XMl schema
- Re: validating xml schemas with the standard schema
- Re: model group: choice and min/maxOccurs for choice elements
- Re: Can instance document schema location hints aid or override those defined in a top-level schema with import declarations?
Tuesday, 4 September 2001
- Corpus of XMLSchema!
- Re: Can instance document schema location hints aid or override those defined in a top-level schema with import declarations?
- Can instance document schema location hints aid or override those defined in a top-level schema with import declarations?
Monday, 3 September 2001
- Schema Validator problem
- Re: XSV validator
- Re: XSV validator
- XSV validator
- Re: default an attribute to an XPATH expression
- default an attribute to an XPATH expression
- Re: schema2dtd
- Re: Variables...
- Re: The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity ref erence
- Re: Complex type inheritance is evil!
Sunday, 2 September 2001
Saturday, 1 September 2001
- Re: Catching node at undetermined depth in key
- Re: Catching node at undetermined depth in key
- Re: Catching node at undetermined depth in key
- Re: Catching node at undetermined depth in key
- MSXML4 schema validation error line number
Friday, 31 August 2001
- Re: Complex type inheritance is evil!
- The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity ref erence