xml-dist-app@w3.org from November 2002 by author

Anne Thomas Manes

• New issue: Error in primer encodingStyle example 17 (Sunday, 17 November)

Arun Kalasapudi

• Xml you have a greeting card from . (Friday, 8 November)

Champion, Mike

• www-tag discussions on SOAP subsetting XML (Monday, 25 November)

David Fallside

• updated soap implementaiton table (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Monday, 18 November)
• SOAP Implementers Report (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Tuesday, 5 November)

David Orchard

• FW: www-tag discussions on SOAP subsetting XML (Tuesday, 26 November)

Don Mullen

• FW: Proposed SOAP tests for implementation features 32.1-2, 38.1- 5, 53.1 (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Proposed SOAP test for implementation features 74/75 (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Proposal: Drop feature 52 from features list (Monday, 25 November)
• SOAP Implementers Report - Nov 14 (Tuesday, 19 November)

Frank Adams-Watters

• SOAP Header Element Question (Tuesday, 5 November)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Discussion summary 2: Proposal for clarifying relationship be tween SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 27 November)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: Discussion summary 2: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Proposal for dealing with SOAP lc issue 395 (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: Proposed SOAP test for implementation feature 54 (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: Discussion summary: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Minutes from SOAP 1.2 implementer's telcon Tuesday, 26 Nov (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: Proposed SOAP test for implementation feature 54 (Monday, 25 November)
• Proposed SOAP test for implementation feature 54 (Monday, 25 November)
• RE: Discussion summary: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: Problem with SOAP Fault/Reason/Text ? (Friday, 22 November)
• RE: SOAP Implementers Report - Nov 14 (Tuesday, 19 November)
• RE: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Thursday, 7 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Proposal for clarifying relationship between MEPs and RPC convention (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Proposal for editorial clarification in part 2, section 4.2.2 RPC Response (Tuesday, 5 November)

Jacek Kopecky

• proposed tests for features 60.? (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Proposed SOAP test for implementation features 74/75 (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Re: Proposal: Drop feature 52 from features list (Monday, 25 November)
• Implementation features: valueType, relay attributes? (Wednesday, 20 November)
• Re: encodingStyle permitted locations (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: Seeking clarification on resolution of issue 389 (Monday, 18 November)
• Re: SOAP Header Element Question (Wednesday, 6 November)
• WebMethod implementation feature (Tuesday, 5 November)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Discussion summary 2: Proposal for clarifying relationship be tween SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Discussion summary 2: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Discussion summary: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 27 November)
• Re: Discussion summary: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Tuesday, 26 November)
• Discussion summary: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)
• Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: New snapshot generated (Saturday, 9 November)
• New snapshot generated (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: SOAP Header Element Question (Thursday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for clarifying relationship between MEPs and RPC convention (Wednesday, 6 November)

Jeffrey Schlimmer

• RE: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Friday, 15 November)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Problem with SOAP Fault/Reason/Text ? (Friday, 22 November)
• Problem with SOAP Fault/Reason/Text ? (Thursday, 21 November)
• Re: encodingStyle permitted locations (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: encodingStyle permitted locations (Tuesday, 19 November)
• encodingStyle permitted locations (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: WebMethod implementation feature (Saturday, 9 November)
• Re: WebMethod implementation feature (Wednesday, 6 November)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Problem with SOAP Fault/Reason/Text ? (Thursday, 21 November)

Nilo Mitra (EUS)

• Snapshot of the updated SOAP 1.2 Primer available (Tuesday, 26 November)
• RE: New issue: Error in primer encodingStyle example 17 (Wednesday, 20 November)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• RE: Problem with SOAP Fault/Reason/Text ? (Friday, 22 November)
• Re: encodingStyle permitted locations (Tuesday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: New snapshot generated (Friday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Friday, 8 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Friday, 8 November)
• Seeking clarification on resolution of issue 389 (Thursday, 7 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Wednesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Re: Issues 368 and 369 Proposal (Tuesday, 5 November)

Paul Kulchenko

• Re: FW: Proposed SOAP tests for implementation features 32.1-2, 38.1-5, 53.1, 59 (Tuesday, 26 November)

Rich Salz

• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)
• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Possible new LC issue: Can SOAP header blocks exist outside SOAP modules? (Thursday, 14 November)

Volker Wiechers

• Re: Proposal for clarifying relationship between SOAP modules and features (Wednesday, 6 November)
• Resolution of Issue 391 (Wednesday, 6 November)

Last message date: Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:44:31 UTC