- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:51:48 -0800
- To: "Paul Kulchenko" <paulclinger@yahoo.com>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "John Koropchak" <johnko@microsoft.com>, "Don Mullen" <donmullen@tibco.com>
- Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Based on input from Paul and folks, the updated test for 54 looks like this. Rather than basing it on R2.echoSimpleTypesAsStruct [4], it is now based on R2.echoString [5] as we only need one parameter to test this case. * * * * * Test for 54 ----------- The test is based on R2.echoString [5]. The sample input is described in [4] but instead of the client sending <m:echoString xmlns:m="http://soapinterop.org/"> <inputString>hello world</inputString> </m:echoString> it sends <m:echoString xmlns:m="http://soapinterop.org/"/> The result is either as in [5] but with either A) the missing input parameter missing in the output as well or with the output parameter having some default value determined by the server or B) a SOAP fault with a Value of "env:Sender" for Code and a Value of "rpc:BadArguments" for Subcode. Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com [4] http://www.whitemesa.com/interop/proposalB.html#echoSimpleTypesAsStruct [5] http://www.whitemesa.com/interop/proposal2.html#echoString
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 13:52:20 UTC