- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:45:40 -0800
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "XMLP Public" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Herve Ruellan" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Jean-Jacques, I am generally fine with this but would it be ok to say A SOAP module realizes *zero* or more SOAP features I don't think we prevent a SOAP module to be written without calling out any particular SOAP features (i.e. specifying them according to the rules in the SOAP 1.2 spec)? Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com >-----Original Message----- >From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] >Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 02:47 >To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen >Cc: David Fallside; Noah Mendelsohn; XMLP Public; Herve Ruellan > >Suggestions for B): > ><revised> >The term 'SOAP module' refers to the specification of the >syntax and semantics of one or more SOAP header blocks. *A >SOAP module realizes one or more SOAP features.* A module >specification adheres to the following rules. It: ></revised> > >and C): > ><revised> >A SOAP Module is a specification that contains the combined >syntax and semantics of SOAP header blocks specified according >to the rules in 3.2 SOAP Modules. *A SOAP module realizes one >or more SOAP features.* </revised> > >I can live with D). > >I am fine with your other changes.
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 12:46:09 UTC