- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:44:18 +0100
- To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
- CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, XMLP Public <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Glen, +1 to your proposed rewrite below. Jean-jacques. Glen Daniels wrote: > I need to read back through the archive to see the rationale for this change, but I think the <current> version is, frankly, much clearer. The term "associated with" does not make it very clear in the latter part of the proposed version that an MEP ISA feature, which I think is important to do here as we're introducing the concept. It's not good enough to just say it in the MEP-specific section, IMHO. Another option might be something like: > > <proposed-GD> > A SOAP feature is an extension of the SOAP messaging framework. > Although SOAP poses no constraints on the potential scope of > such features, example features may include "reliability", > "security", "correlation", "routing", and message exchange > patterns (MEPs) such as request/response, one-way, and > peer-to-peer conversations. > </proposed-GD> > > The rest of the changes seem ok to me. > > Thanks for doing this work, gents,
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2002 12:44:31 UTC