Re: New snapshot generated

Noah,

I think it's fine as is.

Jean-Jacques.

----- Original Message -----
From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <connolly@w3.org>; <frystyk@microsoft.com>; <janet@w3.org>;
<moreau@crf.canon.fr>; <w3c-archive@w3.org>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: New snapshot generated


> Jean-Jacques:
>
> I note that the titles of these say "Editors Copy", not Snapshot.
> Shouldn't that be corrected?  Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
> IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
> 11/08/02 01:11 PM
>
>
>         To:     XMLP Public <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>         cc:     Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>,
Jean-Jacques Moreau
> <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, w3c-archive@w3.org, Noah Mendelsohn
> <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Janet Daily <janet@w3.org>, Dan Connolly
> <connolly@w3.org>, Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
>         Subject:        New snapshot generated
> Categories:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> The editors said would provide a new snapshot for you to peruse
> over the week-end. Well, here is that snaphost:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/11/08/soap12-part1.html
> http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/11/08/soap12-part2.html
>
> This snapshot incorporates all the issues for which the editors
> have resolutions. Issues for which we don't have any resolution:
> 367, 368 and 369 (QA). Issues for which we require additional
> feedback from the WG: 389 (data model and encoding).
>
> Thanks to Janet and DanC for taking time out of their daily work
> and flipping the ACLs.
>
> Have a good week-end.
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
> PS. About half the spec is now "red" or "green"; i.e. a lot of
> the wording has evolved. It is probably high-time to revert to
> B&W only.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 02:55:12 UTC