Tuesday, 1 May 2001
Monday, 30 April 2001
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
Sunday, 29 April 2001
- Recall: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- Recall: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
Friday, 27 April 2001
- Re: mustUnderstand on client side
- Internationalization issue.
- Re: Netscape and RSS
- Re: Netscape and RSS
- Netscape and RSS
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: mustUnderstand on client side
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: mustUnderstand on client side
- Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: update to Issue #82
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
Thursday, 26 April 2001
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- We Guarantee 5,000 Visitors to Your Site in 24 Hours!
- Need Website Traffic? We Generate It!
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- Re: update to Issue #82
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: [soapbuilders] Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: [XML-Question] XML Interop
- RosettaNet to Support Messaging Services Specification Developed by ebXML Initiative
- RE: [soapbuilders] Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- [XML-Question] XML Interop
- Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- Re: [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- Re: update to Issue #82
- [i41] Addressing within envelope or binding-specific?
- RE: update to Issue #82
- RE: update to Issue #82
Wednesday, 25 April 2001
- [i95, i22] - Proposal for clarifying use of SOAPAction
- RE: Reqs/AM - Comments/Questions
- RE: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Fwd: Blocks versus Header and Body
Monday, 23 April 2001
- Re: mustUnderstand on client side
- AM issue: SOAP mappings
- FW: [soapbuilders] >50 SOAP implementations
- Re: Reqs/AM - Comments/Questions
- Confusion about soap:encoding and own xml-schemas
- RE: [soapbuilders] mustUnderstand on client side
Sunday, 22 April 2001
- HTTP Asynchronous Client Notifications (draft paper)
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
Saturday, 21 April 2001
- Issue: Typo in example in SOAP/1.1 section 5.4.2
- RE: [soapbuilders] mustUnderstand on client side
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- Re: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
Friday, 20 April 2001
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies
- RE: [soapbuilders] mustUnderstand on client side
- Re: Modeling RPC with UnitData
- RE: [soapbuilders] mustUnderstand on client side
- Re: [soapbuilders] SOAP Encoding
- Re: [soapbuilders] mustUnderstand on client side
- Re: [soapbuilders] mustUnderstand on client side
Thursday, 19 April 2001
- Re: Reqs/AM - Comments/Questions
- RE: SOAP Interoperability Event in Raleigh?
- RE: Causality: A possible remedy to our one-way, request/response debate.
- 4 and 11 April 2001 teleconference minutes
- SOAP Interoperability Event in Raleigh?
- Reqs/AM - Comments/Questions
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
- Re: XML Protocol specification conformance issues
- Re: the latest/last? Abstract Model document is now available
- Re: Causality: A possible remedy to our one-way, request/response debate.
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
- SOAP issue on the use of root attribute
- the latest/last? Abstract Model document is now available
- Re: [Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com: Two new drafts: Multipart/Interleaved and Application/BatchBeep]
Monday, 16 April 2001
- [Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com: Two new drafts: Multipart/Interleaved and Application/BatchBeep]
- Massive Cross-Post: The State of XML-RPC, April 2001
- FW: AM issue regarding XML protocol blocks targeting
- [AM] A few comments/nits
Saturday, 14 April 2001
- SOAP issue - mustUnderstand Fault
- RE: SOAP spec Sec "5.4.2 Arrays" - namespace used in qualifying arrayelements in a SOAP sample is not correct
- comments on AM
- RE: SOAP spec Sec "5.4.2 Arrays" - namespace used in qualifying arrayelements in a SOAP sample is not correct
Friday, 13 April 2001
Thursday, 12 April 2001
- Re: [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- Re: SOAP spec Sec "5.4.2 Arrays" - namespace used in qualifying array elements in a SOAP sample is not correct
- RE: [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- RE: [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- Re: [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- Re: [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- Re: [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- RE: Naming
- Re: AM issue regarding XML protocol blocks targeting
- [AM] - Modules and Handlers
- AM issue regarding XML protocol blocks targeting
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
Thursday, 12 April 2001
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
- Modeling RPC with UnitData
- Re: AMG: New AM document snapshot 27th March 2001
- short comments on AM 2001-03-30
Tuesday, 10 April 2001
- Re: XML Protocol specification conformance issues
- Re: [i48]: encoding style { was [i47]: XML Protocol WG Issues list d iscussion }
- RE: Causality: A possible remedy to our one-way, request/response debate.
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP -- Schemas and Encodings
- Re: [i48]: encoding style { was [i47]: XML Protocol WG Issues li st discussion }
Monday, 9 April 2001
- Re: [i48]: encoding style { was [i47]: XML Protocol WG Issues list d iscussion }
- [AM] A few comments on Mar 30th Draft
Friday, 6 April 2001
Thursday, 5 April 2001
- Re: Heads up: A key difference between SOAP and XML-RPC
- Re: [AM] 5.3 Attachement of Arbitrary Content
Wednesday, 4 April 2001
- 28 March teleconference minutes
- [AM] 5.3 Attachement of Arbitrary Content
- RE: SOAP implementations for C-based applications
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- SOAP implementations for C-based applications
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- RE: encodingStyle
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- Announce: Happy Birthday to XML-RPC
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Choreographies in SOAP (was RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP (contd))
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Choreographies in SOAP (was RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP (contd))
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Choreographies in SOAP (was RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP (contd))
- metadata or not
Tuesday, 3 April 2001
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- RE: encodingStyle
- Choreographies in SOAP (was RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP (contd))
- RE: Announce: A brief history of SOAP
- Re: encodingStyle
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- XMLP future reference implementation(s)?
- RE: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- FW: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- RE: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- RE: Correlation.MessageRef [was AM corrections]
- RE: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- Re: Correlation.MessageRef [was AM corrections]
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- RE: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- Re: comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- RE: Correlation.MessageRef [was AM corrections]
- RE: AM corrections
- Re: Correlation.MessageRef [was AM corrections]
- Re: AM corrections
Monday, 2 April 2001
- Re: mid-course correction on abstract model for module processing
- comments on 30/3/2001 AM draft
- AMG: Minutes of telecon 28th March 2001
- Re: AM corrections
- RE: Correlation parameter in an XMLP Block
- Announcement in support of SOAP Interoperability - CORRECTION !