Saturday, 31 December 2005
Friday, 30 December 2005
Wednesday, 28 December 2005
- [Bug 2452] Editorial changes to Appendix A
- [Bug 2451] Editorial changes to section 4.2 and 4.3
- [Bug 2450] Editorial changes to section 4.1.6
- [Bug 2438] Allow 'extension' for simpleType/@final
- [Bug 2437] fix typo in Part 2 section 4.1.1
- [Bug 2436] fix typo in {variety} mapping
- [Bug 2434] Use 'alternative' to refer to XML repr choices
- [Bug 2435] Clarify mapping rule for {item type definition} and {member type definitions}
- [Bug 2433] {primitive type definition} mapping rule misleading
- [Bug 2432] lists have a whitespace facet
- [Bug 2431] remove ?substitution? from {final} tableau in datatypes 4.1.1.
Tuesday, 27 December 2005
Friday, 23 December 2005
Thursday, 22 December 2005
- [Bug 2616] Error in XML mapping for target namespace of local attributes, sec. 3.2.2
- [Bug 2616] Error in XML mapping for target namespace of local attributes, sec. 3.2.2
Monday, 19 December 2005
- [Bug 2453] Wrt simpleType, which Part has which subsections normative
- [Bug 2609] Fix/Move Single Facet Valid from part 2 to part 1
- Re: xs:QName in Schema 1.1
Sunday, 18 December 2005
Saturday, 17 December 2005
- [Bug 1853] RQ-141b define and use "ancestor" in mapping rules for simple type defns (Requirement)
- [Bug 2603] Align text on anySimpleType mediating between anyType and simple types
- [Bug 1912] RQ-31e: remove lexicalMappings facet
- [Bug 2223] R-231: Enumeration restrictions are unclear
- [Bug 2454] Clean up enumeration XML Representation parallel to pattern
- [Bug 2335] Add {context} property to type definitions
- [Bug 2337] Add {context} property to simple type definition in Datatypes
- [Bug 2531] R-041: Error in production 10 of regex in Datatypes (error, corrigendum needed)
- [Bug 1853] RQ-141b define and use "ancestor" in mapping rules for simple type defns (Requirement)
- [Bug 1852] RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)
- [Bug 1852] RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)
- [Bug 1843] RQ-141b: Editing intro paragraphs of Datatypes Sec 2 (Requirement)
- [Bug 1837] RQ-21: supply regex / BNF for all primitive types
- [Bug 1907] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for float and double
- [Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement)
- [Bug 1915] RQ-141d: Structures changes to align with Datatypes (Requirement)
- [Bug 1913] RQ-120: use the term 'derived' consistently (Structures) (Desideratum)
- [Bug 2401] Use new term 'owner' more widely, maybe
- [Bug 1929] RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex
- [Bug 2247] R-255: Value of pattern facet
Friday, 16 December 2005
- [Bug 1974] Our published names for datatypes etc. don't resolve
- [Bug 1933] (re)move primitive (and derived) simple type defns from SDForSDs
- [Bug 2214] R-222: Drop the XMLSchema-datatypes namespace?
- [Bug 2313] Tie precisionDecimal to IEEE754R more clearly
Thursday, 15 December 2005
- [Bug 1933] (re)move primitive (and derived) simple type defns from SDForSDs
- [Bug 2603] Align text on anySimpleType mediating between anyType and simple types
- [Bug 2453] Wrt simpleType, which Part has which subsections normative
Wednesday, 14 December 2005
- [Bug 2603] Align text on anySimpleType mediating between anyType and simple types
- [Bug 2602] Correct typo in Element Locally Valid (Complex Type)
Monday, 12 December 2005
- [Bug 2337] Add {context} property to simple type definition in Datatypes
- [Bug 2337] Add {context} property to simple type definition in Datatypes
Saturday, 10 December 2005
- [Bug 2577] xsi loc = redefine loc -- what happens?
- [Bug 2578] What does last paragraph of 3.2.5 mean?
- [Bug 2577] xsi loc = redefine loc -- what happens?
- [Bug 2576] Clarify relation of language type to xml:lang
Friday, 9 December 2005
- [Bug 2221] R-229: Order relation on time
- [Bug 2098] R-108: Clarification requested re: rounding of floats
- [Bug 2306] Union of anySimpleType
- [Bug 2574] Is anySimpleType allowed in unions? lists?
- Re: Order relation on time (Schema comments, 14 Aug 03)
- Re: notes on XML Schema and XInclude
- [Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement)
- [Bug 2080] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime
- [Bug 2571] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime
- [Bug 2571] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime
- [Bug 1919] RQ-150c: specify minimum implementation limits for precisionDecimal (Requirement)
- [Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement)
- [Bug 1927] EP-15: simplify the way lexical and canonical mappings are referred to from the text
- [Bug 1926] EP-14: define 'literal' and use it more consistently
- [Bug 1837] RQ-21: supply regex / BNF for all primitive types
- [Bug 1903] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for boolean
- [Bug 1902] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for string
- [Bug 1837] RQ-21: supply regex / BNF for all primitive types
- [Bug 1927] EP-15: simplify the way lexical and canonical mappings are referred to from the text
- [Bug 1926] EP-14: define 'literal' and use it more consistently
- [Bug 1903] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for boolean
Thursday, 8 December 2005
Wednesday, 7 December 2005
Tuesday, 6 December 2005
Monday, 5 December 2005
- Unique constraint.
- Clarification is still needed on unique constraint
- Tippfehler deutsche Uebersetzung
- unique constraint interpretation.
- XML Schema 1.0 Second Edition Errata
- XML link
- List delimiters
- XML Schema to C converter
- extending multiple base Types
- pointless particles definition
- [www-xml-schema-comments] <none>
- 1.1 Datatypes - suggest base types for IP addresses
- xsi:type Usage
Saturday, 3 December 2005
Thursday, 1 December 2005
Monday, 28 November 2005
Tuesday, 22 November 2005
- XSD-Schematron Integration
- [Bug 2082] R-092: Clarification required for group redefinition
- [Bug 2497] R-127: Distinction between 00:00:00 and 24:00:00 for time datatype?
- Primer 1.1 diagrams
Monday, 21 November 2005
- [Bug 2544] RQ-146: needs clarification re. wildcards
- [Bug 2544] RQ-146: needs clarification re. wildcards
- [Bug 2543] Unique constraint misinterpretation.
Friday, 18 November 2005
- [Bug 1969] Should Part 2 make the component tableaux normative?
- [Bug 2313] Make clearer the relationship between precisionDecimal and IEEE754r
- [Bug 2454] Clean up enumeration XML Representation parallel to pattern
- [Bug 2314] R-200: Problem with erratum E1-18 (datatypes)
- [Bug 1907] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for float and double
- [Bug 2314] R-200: Problem with erratum E1-18 (datatypes)
Wednesday, 16 November 2005
- [Bug 2533] R-196b: Add health warning on use of whitespace facet on elements (datatype)
- [Bug 2532] R-196: Add health warning on use of whitespace facet on elements (structure)
- [Bug 2531] R-041: Error in production 10 of regex in Datatypes (error, corrigendum needed)
Tuesday, 15 November 2005
- [Bug 2098] R-108: Clarification requested re: rounding of floats
- [Bug 2188] R-195: Correct error in the description of order for dateTime
Monday, 14 November 2005
- [Bug 2080] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime
- [Bug 1837] RQ-21: supply regex / BNF for all primitive types
- [Bug 2521] Numbering regular expressions in Appendix H
Friday, 11 November 2005
- [Bug 2423] Clearly define value equality
- [Bug 2423] Clearly define value equality
- [Bug 2506] Relaxing constraints on <all> model groups
- [Bug 2505] RQ-145 Add a "value" PSVI property
- [Bug 2505] RQ-145 Add a "value" PSVI property
Wednesday, 9 November 2005
- [Bug 2214] R-222: Drop the XMLSchema-datatypes namespace?
- [Bug 1933] (re)move primitive (and derived) simple type defns from SDForSDs
- [Bug 1974] Our published names for datatypes etc. don't resolve
- [Bug 2499] R-177: Should list of IDs be allowed?
- [Bug 2175] R-177: Should list of IDs be allowed?
- [Bug 1925] EP-01: clarify complex property values and component classes (Datatypes)
- [Bug 1918] RQ-150b: adjust minimum implementation requirements for decimal (Requirement)
- [Bug 2179] R-185: Question about cardinality of calendar types
- [Bug 2177] R-179: Defect in schema component model wrt enumeration and annotations
- [Bug 2498] remove ?substitution? from {final} tableau in datatypes 4.1.1.
- [Bug 2497] R-127: Distinction between 00:00:00 and 24:00:00 for time datatype?
- [Bug 2080] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime
- [Bug 2251] R-259: Are QNames without prefix bindings type-valid?
- [Bug 2454] Clean up enumeration XML Representation parallel to pattern
- [Bug 2074] R-084: Can final="extension" for simpleType?
- [Bug 2438] Allow 'extension' for simpleType/@final
- [Bug 2496] R-196b: Add health warning on use of whitespace facet on elements
- [Bug 2496] R-196b: Add health warning on use of whitespace facet on elements
- [Bug 2173] R-175: Questions re: normalizedString
- [Bug 1893] R-203: Inconsistency with constraints on min/maxExclusive
- [Bug 1969] Should Part 2 make the component tableaux normative?
Friday, 4 November 2005
- [Bug 2454] Clean up enumeration XML Representation parallel to pattern
- [Bug 2453] Wrt simpleType, which Part has which subsections normative
- [Bug 2452] Editorial changes to Appendix A
- [Bug 2451] Editorial changes to section 4.2 and 4.3
- [Bug 2450] Editorial changes to section 4.1.6
- [Bug 2449] Datatype Valid is broken
- [Bug 2437] fix typo in Part 2 section 4.1.1
- [Bug 2435] Clarify mapping rule for {item type definition} and {member type definitions}
Thursday, 3 November 2005
- [Bug 2439] ChecK new RFC 3066 bis
- [Bug 2434] Use 'alternative' to refer to XML repr choices
- [Bug 2431] remove ?substitution? from the property values allowed for {final} in datatypes 4.1.1.
- [Bug 2438] Allow 'extension' for simpleType/@final
- [Bug 2438] Allow 'extension' for simpleType/@final
- [Bug 2438] Allow 'extension' for simpleType/@final
- [Bug 2074] R-084: Can final="extension" for simpleType?
- [Bug 2437] fix typo in Part 2 section 4.1.1
- [Bug 2435] Clarify mapping rule for {item type definition} and {member type definitions}
- [Bug 2436] fix typo in {variety} mapping
- [Bug 2435] Clarify mapping rule for {item type definition} and {member type definitions}
- [Bug 2434] Use 'alternative' to refer to XML repr choices
- [Bug 2433] {primitive type definition} mapping rule misleading
- [Bug 2432] lists have a whitespace facet
- [Bug 2192] R-199: Problem with final for simple types
- [Bug 2431] remove ?substitution? from the property values allowed for {final} in datatypes 4.1.1.
Tuesday, 1 November 2005
- [Bug 1918] RQ-150b: adjust minimum implementation requirements for decimal (Requirement)
- [Bug 1907] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for float and double
- [Bug 2227] R-235: Canonical rep'n of -0.0
Friday, 28 October 2005
- [Bug 2249] R-257: Health warning needed about percent-escaping URIs
- [Bug 2238] R-246: IDREFS and space
- [Bug 2221] R-229: Order relation on time
- [Bug 2213] R-221: Question about decimal values with >18 digits
- [Bug 2211] R-219: Does section 3.11.1 of part 1 need to refer to list, union?
- [Bug 2423] Clearly define value equality
- [Bug 2201] R-209: appinfo and documentation elements have no id attribute
- [Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement)
Thursday, 27 October 2005
- [Bug 2053] R-064: Issue with complex type property mapping rules for content type
- [Bug 2038] R-060: Problem with particle derivation rules and the Schema for Schemas
- [Bug 2337] Datatypes part of {context} property
- [Bug 2335] Add {context} property to type definitions
- [Bug 2247] R-255: Value of pattern facet
- [Bug 2401] Use new term 'owner' more widely, maybe
- [Bug 1929] RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex
- [Bug 1929] RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex
- [Bug 2247] R-255: Value of pattern facet
- [Bug 2401] Use new term 'owner' more widely, maybe
- [Bug 2335] Add {context} property to type definitions
- [Bug 2337] Datatypes part of {context} property
Friday, 21 October 2005
Thursday, 20 October 2005
- [Bug 2401] Use new term 'owner' more widely, maybe
- [Bug 1929] RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex
Friday, 14 October 2005
- [Bug 2169] R-172: Questions viz. when fields match element with the ur-type
- [Bug 2088] R-098: must lexical form map to a value?
- [Bug 2082] R-092: Clarification required for group redefinition
- [Bug 1969] Should Part 2 make the component tableaux normative?
- [Bug 2048] R-182: clarify equality and identity of union values
- [Bug 2019] R-041: Error in production 10 of regex in Datatypes (error, corrigendum needed)
- [Bug 2206] R-214: Question about the value space of double
- [Bug 2221] R-229: Order relation on time
- [Bug 2048] R-182: clarify equality and identity of union values
Tuesday, 11 October 2005
- Re: [XSCD] EBNF production
- [Bug 1892] R-180: Question about the schema error code property in the PSVI
Monday, 10 October 2005
- [Bug 2338] Structures part of {context} property
- [Bug 2337] Datatypes part of {context} property
- [Bug 2335] Add {context} property to type definitions
- [XSCD] EBNF production
Saturday, 8 October 2005
- [Bug 2044] R-198: ensure that unions of unions retain union-level facets
- [Bug 2333] R-198: ensure that unions of unions retain union-level facets (Structures)
Thursday, 6 October 2005
- [Bug 2330] How to redefine a component in an included schema document
- [Bug 2210] R-218: Clarification required for complexContent extending simpleContent
- [Bug 2238] R-246: IDREFS and space
- [Bug 1892] R-180: Question about the schema error code property in the PSVI
- [Bug 2088] R-098: must lexical form map to a value?
- [Bug 2088] R-098: must lexical form map to a value?
- [Bug 2019] R-041: Error in production 10 of regex in Datatypes (error, corrigendum needed)
- [Bug 2309] Clarify identity of values across related simple types
- [Bug 2327] Equality of IDC field values
Wednesday, 5 October 2005
- 1.1 Datatypes suggestion: Base types for IP addresses and domain names
- 1.1 Structure suggestion: union of complex content
Tuesday, 4 October 2005
- [Bug 2327] Equality of IDC field values
- [Bug 1936] Clarification needed on validation rules for "skipped" subtree
- [Bug 2187] R-194: Question re: processContents=skip #2
- [Bug 2197] R-205: Question re: mixed on complexType and complexContent
- [Bug 1893] R-203: Inconsistency with constraints on min/maxExclusive
- [Bug 1891] R-128: Question re: leading zeros for gYearMonth and gMonth (clarifying corrigendum needed)
- [Bug 2328] Should "restriction" always imply "subsumption"?
- [Bug 2176] R-178: Question about use and fixed for attributes
- [Bug 2327] Equality of IDC field values