- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:09:28 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2577 ------- Additional Comments From noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2005-12-10 02:09 ------- FWIW, I strongly feel that the pervasive effect of redefine should trump any implications to the contrary that may be read into the text regarding include. If the effect of redefine is not pervasive, then we have the potential of two or more different versions of the same named definition or declaration being used in the same schema, and I think that's a very bad idea. ref="..." and similar constructs should unambiguously resolve to the "most redefined" version of a component, regardless of where the reference appears. The only exception is that the redefinitions themselves can have access to their similarly named antecedents, e.g. as base types. Noah
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 02:09:44 UTC