- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:36:44 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2574
Summary: Is anySimpleType allowed in unions? lists?
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
There is some uncertainty about whether XSD 1.0 allows or forbids
the use of anySimpleType as a member type in constructing a union
or as an item type when constructing a list.
It can be (and has been) argued that Structures section 3.4.16,
validation rule Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) rules it
out in clause 3.1, which requires that the member types of
a union must have {variety} = list or {variety} = union.
But it has also been argued that there is material in Datatypes which
suggests that anySimpleType is indeed legal as a member of a union.
We may need clarification in the text of 1.0, either way. And
some WG members would like agreement on whether anySimpleType can
be a member of a union in 1.0, before deciding what the rules
should be in 1.1 and closing bug 2306.
Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 20:36:57 UTC