- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:01:34 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2213
sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2005-10-28 19:01 -------
Discussed at 2005-10-28 telecon [1].
We have discussed this specific point, and concluded that while it looks
anomolous, there is no actual problem here: either you only cover 18
digits in the derived types as well, or you use a different underlying
implementation.
Resolution: So close this with no further action: RESOLVED, WONTFIX.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Oct/0022.html
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 19:01:43 UTC