- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:47:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2408 Summary: Consistency need wrt "forbidden" and "must be absent" Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org In the published 1.1 datatypes draft http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.html {primitive type definition} ..., otherwise forbidden. {item type definition} ..., otherwise forbidden. {member type definitions} ..., otherwise must be absent. I think they should be consistent and all say "must be absent". This also applies to {referenced key} for identity constraints in part 1.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2005 16:47:40 UTC