[Bug 2433] {primitive type definition} mapping rule misleading

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2433


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2005-12-28 01:21 -------
As near as I can tell from the opaque description of this issue,
it was intended to be used to track the decision to recast the
description of the {primitive type definition} mapping in Datatypes
4.1.2.  The wording agreed on in Edinburgh was "If the 
corresponding datatype is ·special· or ·primitive·, then as 
specified in Built-in Simple Type Definitions (§4.1.6), 
otherwise, among the ancestors of this STD, that STD which 
corresponds to a primitive datatype."  

This wording was integrated into the status quo document
on 8 December 2005, so I'm marking this resolved.

Received on Wednesday, 28 December 2005 01:21:40 UTC