- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:20:25 +0100
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
* Henry S. Thompson wrote: >> > Where is clarification required -- I wasn't aware there was >> > any area where is was not clear that unprefixed QNames are >> > default-namespace qualified. >> >> The only thing that Schema Part 2 (section 3.2.18) says about the mapping of >> the lexical space to the value space for QNames is the Note: "The mapping >> between literals in the ·lexical space· and values in the ·value space· of >> QName requires a namespace declaration to be in scope for the context in >> which QName is used." > >This will be clarified in a forthcoming erratum, sorry. Where in http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata is this erratum?
Received on Sunday, 18 December 2005 21:26:56 UTC