- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:14:57 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2337 ------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org 2005-12-12 20:14 ------- There appears to me to be an error in the text approved by the WG at its meeting of 21 October. The proposal acted on there reads in part The {context} property is only relevant for anonymous type definitions, for which its value is the component in which this type definition appears as the value of a property, e.g. {item type definition} or {base type definition}. But there are some anonymous type definitions which will not have a {context} property, namely definitions shadowed by a redefinition. Such definitions have no name, and thus would seem to qualify as anonymous, but we agreed in Edinburgh that they would not acquire a context property, indeed that no global / top-level components would have a context property. I believe the paragraph would be correct if it read The {context} property is only relevant for type definitions local to some other definition or declaration, for which its value is the component in which this type definition appears as the value of a property, e.g. {item type definition} or {base type definition}. This has the disadvantage of being clunkier: we are punished for our failure to define simple terminology for global vs. local components. (I would change the status of the issue to reopened, except that it is already in that status, for reasons which don't seem to have been recorded.)
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 20:15:09 UTC