- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:50:49 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2544
Summary: RQ-146: needs clarification re. wildcards
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Consider the following "tricky" indirect case involving a wildcard referencing
a global element:
<element name="a" type="string"/>
<complexType name="example-2">
<sequence>
<element name="a" type="int"/>
<element name="whatever"/>
<any namespace="##targetNamespace" processContents="lax"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
Clearly the local <a> and the indirect reference to the global <a>
are "inconsistent" with each other within the content model of the above
example but I'm not sure if the "directly, indirectly, or implicitly" language
in the EDC rule captures this case.
See mail from: David Bau
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003OctDec/0029.html
See reply from: Henry Thompson
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003OctDec/0030.html
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 15:50:58 UTC