- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:50:49 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2544 Summary: RQ-146: needs clarification re. wildcards Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Consider the following "tricky" indirect case involving a wildcard referencing a global element: <element name="a" type="string"/> <complexType name="example-2"> <sequence> <element name="a" type="int"/> <element name="whatever"/> <any namespace="##targetNamespace" processContents="lax"/> </sequence> </complexType> Clearly the local <a> and the indirect reference to the global <a> are "inconsistent" with each other within the content model of the above example but I'm not sure if the "directly, indirectly, or implicitly" language in the EDC rule captures this case. See mail from: David Bau http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003OctDec/0029.html See reply from: Henry Thompson http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003OctDec/0030.html
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 15:50:58 UTC