www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from July to September 2005 by date

Monday, 26 September 2005

• CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Mark Baker

Saturday, 3 September 2005

• SVG WG Last Call review of XLink 1.1 Chris Lilley

Wednesday, 24 August 2005

• Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 16 August 2005

• Base URI of a processing instruction Colin Paul Adams

Friday, 5 August 2005

• XLink 1.1 WD: Optional type attribute Christian Biesinger

Thursday, 4 August 2005

• [xlink11] event handling of nested links Anne van Kesteren
• [xlink11] error handling Anne van Kesteren
• [xlink11] integration with CSS Anne van Kesteren
• [xlink11] integration with existing markup Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 26 July 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: 5.2 example incorrect Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: 5.2 example incorrect Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Outdated references Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined Norman Walsh

Monday, 11 July 2005

• XLink 1.1: Schema issues Webb Roberts

Saturday, 9 July 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Daniel Veillard
• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Animation Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Daniel Veillard
• Re: XLink 1.1: Animation Daniel Veillard
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Daniel Veillard
• XLink 1.1: Animation Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Security Considerations Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: default xmlns attribute values Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd import Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Error handling Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: "URI reference" "checking" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: 5.4 "URI reference" unclear Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: XML Base confusion Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: 5.2 example incorrect Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Outdated references Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XLink 1.1: Open issues? Bjoern Hoehrmann

Last message date: Monday, 26 September 2005 14:29:33 UTC