Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:49:49PM +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >In general is sounds unwise to try to add to XLink behaviour expectations
> >about all the upper layers which may interract with XLink defined linking
> >constructs. The level of recognition an processing applied by other layers
> >can't be put within XLink, it would make XLink conflict with the specification
> >of those application layers or the evolution of them over time.
> If someone implements a XML 1.0 + CSS + XLink 1.1 user agent there are
> basically just three specifications that can define the rules here. If
> it's a bad idea to make such a user agent, this needs to be clear from
> XLink 1.1, if not there need to be clear processing rules. How the XML
> Core Working Group achieves this is of less concern to me.

  Then you have your answer, CSS says "link" and XLink-1.1 defines links,
so :link applies to links defined by XLink-1.1 constructs. That's my answer
not the XML Core WG one.


Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  | Rpmfind RPM search engine | 

Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 10:57:03 UTC