* Daniel Veillard wrote: >In general is sounds unwise to try to add to XLink behaviour expectations >about all the upper layers which may interract with XLink defined linking >constructs. The level of recognition an processing applied by other layers >can't be put within XLink, it would make XLink conflict with the specification >of those application layers or the evolution of them over time. If someone implements a XML 1.0 + CSS + XLink 1.1 user agent there are basically just three specifications that can define the rules here. If it's a bad idea to make such a user agent, this needs to be clear from XLink 1.1, if not there need to be clear processing rules. How the XML Core Working Group achieves this is of less concern to me. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 10:49:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:16 UTC