Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance

* Norman Walsh wrote:
>/ Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> was heard to say:
>|   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ does not conform to
>| <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/>,
>
>In what way, and how can you tell?

It does not require content to conform to Charmod as required in section
2 of charmod and C014 is violated due to adopting RFC 3987, for example.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2005 19:29:37 UTC