Re: XLink 1.1: Animation

* Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ is unclear about
>> how it integrates with SMIL animation, please change the draft such
>> that it integrates well with SMIL animation.
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil-animation-20010904/#SpecifyingAnimationTarget
>
>  already references XLink. The integration is being done from SMIL Animation
>itself. I don't see what your integration problem may be.

It's most obvious that for the purposes of SMIL animation a format needs
to be clear which attributes can be target of which animations. Neither
XLink 1.1 nor SMIL define e.g. whether the xlink:title attribute is
animatable.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 10:33:32 UTC