* Daniel Veillard wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xlink11-20050707/ is unclear about >> how it integrates with SMIL animation, please change the draft such >> that it integrates well with SMIL animation. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-smil-animation-20010904/#SpecifyingAnimationTarget > > already references XLink. The integration is being done from SMIL Animation >itself. I don't see what your integration problem may be. It's most obvious that for the purposes of SMIL animation a format needs to be clear which attributes can be target of which animations. Neither XLink 1.1 nor SMIL define e.g. whether the xlink:title attribute is animatable. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Saturday, 9 July 2005 10:33:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:16 UTC