www-ws-desc@w3.org from January 2005 by author

Amelia A Lewis

Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Monday, 31 January)
Re: SOAP Header Blocks in WSDL (was RE: First Class Headers - Propose d Resolution for LC76d (Monday, 31 January)
Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Friday, 28 January)
Re: Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties (Friday, 28 January)
Re: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Friday, 28 January)
Re: Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties (Friday, 28 January)
Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Friday, 28 January)
Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Friday, 28 January)
Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Thursday, 27 January)
Re: New Twisty Alternate Versions of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 (Wednesday, 5 January)
Re: New Twisty Alternate Versions of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 (Wednesday, 5 January)

Arthur Ryman

Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Monday, 31 January)
Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Friday, 28 January)
Re: Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties (Friday, 28 January)
Re: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Friday, 28 January)
RE: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Thursday, 27 January)
RE: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Thursday, 27 January)
What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Thursday, 27 January)
Re: Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Thursday, 27 January)
Proposed Changes to the Interface Component, Features and Properties (Thursday, 27 January)
Proposal for Simplifications to the Component Model (Thursday, 27 January)
RE: Choice of response message in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 January)
Re: Choice of response message in WSDL (Monday, 24 January)
Comments on Primer (Monday, 24 January)
XML 1.1 Dropped, XSD 1.0 Simple Types Used (Friday, 21 January)
Initial PDF Version of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 Available (Wednesday, 19 January)
Re: wsdli:wsdlLocation WSDL-version independent (Monday, 10 January)
Re: New Twisty Alternate Versions of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 (Wednesday, 5 January)
Re: New Twisty Alternate Versions of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 (Wednesday, 5 January)
New Twisty Alternate Versions of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 (Wednesday, 5 January)

Asir Vedamuthu

SOAP Header Blocks in WSDL (was RE: First Class Headers - Propose d Resolution for LC76d (Monday, 31 January)
RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Friday, 28 January)
RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Thursday, 27 January)
Proposed Resolution for LC52a (Thursday, 27 January)
Proposed Resolution for LC52a (Thursday, 27 January)
Proposed Resolution for LC75t and LC92 (Thursday, 27 January)
Proposed Resolution for LC75s and LC91 (Thursday, 27 January)
RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Monday, 24 January)
First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Monday, 24 January)
RE: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only (Monday, 17 January)
RE: Issue 259 Some alternatives, proposals (Thursday, 6 January)

David Booth

Action item on changing processor conformance to document conformance (Monday, 31 January)
RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Friday, 28 January)
[Fwd: FW: Proposed Resolution for LC52a] (Thursday, 27 January)
Re: Comments on Primer (Wednesday, 26 January)
Re: Meaning of a WSDL document (Thursday, 13 January)

David Orchard

Headers Proposal V1.2 (Friday, 21 January)
Headers proposal V 1.1 (compatible with V1.0) (Friday, 21 January)
Headers proposal revisited (Thursday, 20 January)

Francisco Curbera

apparent bug on the operation name mapping requirement text (Thursday, 20 January)

Gagnon, Stephane

Last CFP: Workshop on Business Services Networks (BSN) (Saturday, 22 January)
Workshop on Business Services Networks (BSN) (Thursday, 6 January)

Glen Daniels

RE: Last Call issue: How does the Operation Name Mapping Requirement (Part 1, section 2.2.1.1) relate to interface inheritance? (Thursday, 6 January)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Monday, 31 January)
Re: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Friday, 28 January)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Wednesday, 26 January)
Re: Initial PDF Version of WSDL 2.0 Part 1 Available (Thursday, 20 January)

Jonathan Marsh

Minutes, 27 Jan 2005 WS Description telcon (Saturday, 29 January)
Minutes [+ summary]: 19-20 January 2005 WS Description FTF (Friday, 28 January)
Agenda, 27 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 26 January)
[revised] Agenda, 20-21 January 2005 WS Desc FTF, Melbourne AUS (Wednesday, 19 January)
Agenda, 19 Jan 2005 joint WS Description, WS Addressing FTF meeting (Monday, 17 January)
Agenda, 20-21 January 2005 WS Desc FTF, Melbourne AUS (Saturday, 15 January)
Minutes, 13 Jan 2005 WS Description telcon (Thursday, 13 January)
[revised] Agenda, 13 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 12 January)
Agenda, 13 January 2004 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 11 January)
Minutes, 6 Jan 2005 WS Description telcon (Tuesday, 11 January)
Agenda, 6 January 2004 WS Desc telcon [Media Type Description] (Tuesday, 4 January)

Liu, Kevin

RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Friday, 28 January)
RE: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Wednesday, 26 January)
RE: Comments on Primer (Wednesday, 26 January)
RE: Choice of response message in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 January)

Mark Nottingham

Re: Issue 259 Some alternatives, proposals (Thursday, 6 January)

paul.downey@bt.com

RE: Two logical WSDL documents describing the same service (Friday, 28 January)

Prasad Yendluri

Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Wednesday, 26 January)

Roberto Chinnici

Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Friday, 28 January)
Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Thursday, 27 January)
Re: Agenda, 20-21 January 2005 WS Desc FTF, Melbourne AUS (Sunday, 16 January)

Rogers, Tony

Meeting records list still in 2004... (Thursday, 27 January)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Sunday, 30 January)
Re: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Friday, 28 January)
Re: First Class Headers - Proposed Resolution for LC76d (Thursday, 27 January)

Tom Jordahl

RE: Headers proposal V 1.1 (compatible with V1.0) (Friday, 21 January)
RE: Action 2004-11-11 check on operation@style (LC61a) (or REOPE N LC21 Resolution B) (Monday, 3 January)

Tony Fletcher

RE: Choice of response message in WSDL (Wednesday, 26 January)
Choice of response message in WSDL (Monday, 24 January)

Ugo Corda

RE: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Thursday, 27 January)
RE: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Thursday, 27 January)
RE: What Happens if 2 Inline Schemas Define the Same Element? (Thursday, 27 January)

Yalcinalp, Umit

What is the SOAP MEP for In-only (Friday, 14 January)
ACTION 2005-01-06 Umit to respond to Henry (Thursday, 13 January)
Issue 263 (Lexical and value space of the attributes and XML Schema Decl) Proposed Resolution (Thursday, 6 January)
Issue 262 (Value of contentType and the range specified by expectedMediaType) Proposed Resolution (Thursday, 6 January)
Issue 261 (Allow expecteMediaType to contain '*') Proposed Resolution (Thursday, 6 January)
Issue 268 (Interop Problems with Accept header) Proposed Resolution (Thursday, 6 January)
Issue 266 Differentiating the type of binary Content when no schema is present (Wednesday, 5 January)
Issue 259 Some alternatives, proposals (Wednesday, 5 January)
Issue 260 Some alternatives (Wednesday, 5 January)
Issue 258 Proposed Resolution (Wednesday, 5 January)
RE: Agenda, 6 January 2004 WS Desc telcon [Media Type Description] (Wednesday, 5 January)

Last message date: Monday, 31 January 2005 21:42:43 UTC