- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 03:13:01 +0100
- To: <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <public-ws-media-types@w3.org>
Hi Henry, I am writing in response to the note/proposal you sent to the media types mailing list [1] with respect to the media types document design [2] on behalf of the WSD wg to resolve issue 272 [3] . We discussed your email in the wg and we are trying to understand the details of your proposal wrt using notations. -- Could you be able to rework all the examples in the note [2] to utilize notations to help us? We have several examples in the doc which shows the relationships between contentType and expectedMediaType attributes. We want to understand clearly how they would be reworked exactly with the notations, etc. This will really help us understanding notations better. -- You mentioned we would not need expectedMediaType attributes, and I would like to understand how. Are you assuming that all expectedMediaType usage will be designated by notations? I expect the answer to the previous question to clarify this. -- It seems to me that we would have to devise a mapping between the RFC2616 [4] Accept content header values that define the content model for expectedMediaType attribute to URIs using notations. There are several aspects of this problem that I am curious to understand how notations will help: (a)The current content model of expectedMediaType allows parameters (such as charset) , parameter values, etc. Further it is a range of values, i.e. "text/xml, text/html". It would really help us to see Example 5 reworked to see how the values are going to be URIs. Clearly our definition of expectedMediaType is not a single value as in [5]. (b) Another example we would like to see with notations is when the expectedMediaType in the Schema were to contain the value "text/*", and the value of the contentType was "text/xml; charset=UTF16". I would appreciate if your notation example could address this case. We are trying to understand your suggestion wrt notations better. Therefore, additional examples/comparison with what we have and what you are suggesting will definitely help us here. Thanks for your help in advance, --umit [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-media-types/2004Nov/0011.h tml [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-media-types/ [3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.h tml#x272 [4] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.html [5] http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/ ---------------------- Dr. Umit Yalcinalp NetWeaver Standards SAP Labs, LLC 3410 Hillview Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94304 umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 02:13:43 UTC